From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OV0Nx-0004kx-TC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:55:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 559C8E07E2; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AECBE07E2 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39so536910wyb.40 for ; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=UqSK8CT/DL3IhhhlFdgEuK21rKguPIqMwfAq/WxwyFM=; b=NPH9uGzPghL0N6pzsv97TKSuYzTFJATdI2DIH4voSn+dVRD/tSsAmoFYjcL92nicYn /xlJYeSps9++AwgirElEqEHt6QCz0pyPmqrM4adeJ2hiu4y6/8cmsPY+5FhRCtT86X7b 8HGns5Zkw2qt607Do9tCgM+vonuKjNWyv5Gjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=xB5BJFpfM9Nliwt5Jb/V5DuFv6Zaz1VfDCacIzgXdsYosUJTm2a60Ymj8oW/YB03UR lzHmlM+xvO8GvGTje5rRLRH+jgkTYceXj33+cau1KJf9nvKFoyoy/tcd7ePEJk2HsGHO AJIGe4JHF5x8bC639zl0NRQbSlrjXo5Rmauh0= Received: by 10.227.158.15 with SMTP id d15mr210905wbx.24.1278154513906; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i25sm12880610wbi.10.2010.07.03.03.55.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:55:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> <4C2DF0EA.6090308@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <4C2DF0EA.6090308@libertytrek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8480285.HA1YOUC2LC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007031155.12818.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 7f905d41-7656-4072-8d64-2c3e93c15fec X-Archives-Hash: dd05879318f37192604f8af6520b7fc8 --nextPart8480285.HA1YOUC2LC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I > > use don't do that. > >=20 > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy >=20 > -10 this is plain wrong... >=20 > Use a mail client that has 'Reply-To-List' function. >=20 > Thunderbird's works very well no, so there is an excellent > cross-platform mail client available that implements this functionality... >=20 > > as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the > > whole mailing list. > >=20 > > What do you think about changing of policy? >=20 > +1, but not for the same reasons... >=20 > Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the > Reply-To, but no longer. Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have post= ed=20 to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly responded= =20 has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to it the post= =20 will not go to the list, but the person that emailed me. Pressing 'l' in=20 kmail just brings up an empty to field. This seems to happen only with som= e=20 replies. Will keep an eye out for it to see if it is consistent. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart8480285.HA1YOUC2LC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwvFxAACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZ1iACg5xmBo6GckqDuB/1WJYUd4vAE iSkAnidVAzCzkBiB1EFyfEGb1faC39bt =r9Sr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8480285.HA1YOUC2LC--