From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUnqe-0003r9-VQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:32:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA91BE08AE; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67234E08AE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A2D864B15C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 22:31:32 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 22:31:25 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply Message-ID: <20100702223125.6aa21081@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> <4C2D5D5D.6010109@gmail.com> <87k4petd7e.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <201007021202.41048.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs11 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/2hIDApdr4Kv5hF2k5K88ROv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9f4893d0-6684-4f2d-9286-30bff111adb9 X-Archives-Hash: f0bf7eb37c5a3ee30d69b31c587f82ff --Sig_/2hIDApdr4Kv5hF2k5K88ROv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:19:36 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change what > happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" to > contain his address as well as the list address so that he gets a > direct response and doesn't have to bother to check the mailing list > for replies. So he wants other people to take the trouble to reply, but he won't take the trouble to look for the replies? If he really finds it so difficult to look for replies to his mails (some mailers will highlight them), he could always set up a filter to copy replies to him to his mailbox. You don't always need everyone else to change to get what you want. --=20 Neil Bothwick A TRUE Klingon warrior does not comment his code! --Sig_/2hIDApdr4Kv5hF2k5K88ROv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwuWrIACgkQum4al0N1GQNSdgCfffGz5X2QOVJ71rJCMGWLZ8ke OiEAn17t6BZzLPUr05BMPWsIKaRZZSdP =zrQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2hIDApdr4Kv5hF2k5K88ROv--