From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUb4L-000084-00 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:53:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B53A31C0A3; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out.malagasy.com (smtp-out.malagasy.com [41.204.104.33]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384D21C0A3 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-1.blueline.mg (unknown [41.204.104.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out.malagasy.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA089881EE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:53:46 +0300 (EAT) Received: from localhost (spamassassin.malagasy.com [41.204.104.47]) by smtp-1.blueline.mg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3424A0AB for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:53:34 +0300 (EAT) X-Virus-Scanned: par antivirus.malagasy.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.736 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.736 required=7 tests=[AWL=-0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp-1.blueline.mg ([41.204.104.52]) by localhost (spamassassin.malagasy.com [41.204.104.47]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJJGiDhe7QJF for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:53:38 +0300 (EAT) Received: from packard.rktmb.org (static-104-10.blueline.mg [41.204.104.10]) by smtp-1.blueline.mg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A2F4A0A4 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:53:26 +0300 (EAT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:53:25 +0300 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply Message-ID: <20100702105325.33e13935@packard.rktmb.org> In-Reply-To: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> References: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> Organization: GULFSAT X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 75f46056-03eb-4f21-bee9-547c789a57b7 X-Archives-Hash: 995c3dac0fac43420e20ed586763a1a3 > Nicolas Sebrecht : >It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" If the replier-to-all thinks of removing unwanted recipients, yes. But most of the time, people "reply-to-really-all" and that annoys. Among that, when replying-to-all, messages "To:" the mailing list are "List-id"/"X-Mailing-List" set, but the others are not. As far as the clever filter way is to filter on "List-id"/"X-Mailing-List" (not on the "Subject:" for mailing lists), I'd rather "Reply-To" on the list. -- Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat: Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement +261 34 56 000 19