From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUWBC-0002vC-2v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:40:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 245BDE0B34; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D068EE0B34 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so340175wwe.4 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6fUqbQBEJw7zz4EDX9AEMT24Kj9HzX8h0tE6BYPu+Uk=; b=b1L1R7x/YIvcBu+CYWpd5ST3SIQAI/WSKfjX4PYQ1Z/+2QHYdXhvwnHUB+nw+7SDSh 1fK9tmz7fn0fVowBOJN/RHSGMFble9pefERLlcwFoF3WZIYorfbFV3+6cUF5HPtFrryE CiW65o6PGHRPRNp2fzW+4gER9gtgxAqq7JYYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=wmHw+jdFuWzwAASGeTY0KxGJASB9sZEkw0bbuE9GWbjLVR5yDMvQhRV3OKXA0YrhFv 152YOF+opKBs66T0Jt1q25ioXwsHUreolX0ABAoXWhR+qRFCnSf1SvEywCOJ+yy4O0C9 GyX8KBjeDuoIt6ejfby1dWeqYf9IVNPtJmyIk= Received: by 10.227.156.82 with SMTP id v18mr10399wbw.1.1278038382720; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from @ (aqu33-8-83-155-187-36.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.187.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i25sm688143wbi.16.2010.07.01.19.39.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nicolas Sebrecht Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 04:39:39 +0200 From: Nicolas Sebrecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.6 won't install Message-ID: <20100702023939.GA18311@vidovic> References: <78e0dabc1003231731r50cd0b92jb5c5d51d0107b7e4@mail.gmail.com> <20100701235902.GF9344@vidovic> <1278034465.157265.6.camel@paska> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1278034465.157265.6.camel@paska> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 8ef131eb-71e4-4d2e-9000-9923cbfb0b4a X-Archives-Hash: e2a1f262a0775f64624cfcf4f2eab4e2 On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:34:25PM -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote: > The OP was over 3 months ago. I think a lack of response speaks volumes > compared to responding so late. It was a thread that was DOA. Why did > you decide to dig it up? The real reason is that I don't have time to track this list in a per day, week or even in a per month basis. I don't think it's a problem that much. Is there any reason to not answer, even late? Some problem are blocking, some aren't and can be delayed a long time. Who knows? Even if everything seems to show the problem is solved or turned around, people usually like to understand what could have happen or have more clues. I already had such feedback for problems older than one year. Now, what I was saying is more about "how to make my chances bigger to have answers in general" than trying to explain "why a lack of response". -- Nicolas Sebrecht