From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-112358-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OUUX4-0004hv-LU
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:55:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0DD0E0AA9;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 00:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2CAE0AA9
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Jul 2010 00:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so19440wwb.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc
         :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
         :user-agent;
        bh=CH2h4X0/mPd3WwlsGIDQIqNwH5+kgrqy5HMN2ZMjRW4=;
        b=HQxQfeM0JNWzP30gy++e8HFSL1ou/Fgl2TH8fm3yqJWMKepq3ZmsbYjQyPnITrqEHQ
         I5xYu70d5D2EVIl8zYrA8ys9DGZpjjy67hgFWHIZKsOXlM95/3GpHi+WecoQVMzT3lw1
         RZtJN9TCSqGN5Va2InhinIokrabV6pCgugwPE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:user-agent;
        b=AL+wKiEhi7XhtlJMn5xvYaz63B7oEAQmc9bKLYoaMhpPWX8rcwi9Pdn/Yulo6gCRWo
         JVqA7Vl5ihJDhAyqyM8ynooErWJE7INS2B/d4SlrSpI6KEKKXoaCSgw+rghPZZT11ws7
         0cO/mq7GBZlC8ftIDO95q2yZKuYpZ7moh/Mjc=
Received: by 10.227.135.70 with SMTP id m6mr195355wbt.68.1278032075900;
        Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from @ (aqu33-8-83-155-187-36.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.187.36])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm23399wbb.20.2010.07.01.17.54.35
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Nicolas Sebrecht <ni.s.nis33@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200
From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply
Message-ID: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Archives-Salt: 7f65975e-cb42-423a-bbd3-721fde06a496
X-Archives-Hash: b50e16cae3a799f39b9c838b62b2dd2f

Hi all,

I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address.  Most mailing lists I
use don't do that.

It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit
to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing
list.

What do you think about changing of policy?

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht