From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OU4fW-0003h0-6U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:18:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4218E0CB6; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A322EE0CB6 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so194052wwa.10 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=61k98R5Ko79EXGcqvf9U1VqLapbhOQgXsju8uoX6PdQ=; b=nWKsV2OdCi+qIvKfi+F0hWDyVcLloRuecFk5ur92yG9zpAhWmYrHE0Pn/efUCM9B3b KVx4VOI02mourlZZ8zv6VmhqyfIIHkLD5N2fRB0iXVNe8sinklSbUAfFmYdQte6pKvck vy7gLSItruCnBFmFkoSU9iJ+24M7so65yGhqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=aLaXj6eykPG9xPtq5TarkKunp9O2qHTajkFkXETPHOTxVe9/+34/iRRuNnQIXdWGgh HnsW298X1ee8pe0bxHc3s9CAB9FRMWsOaGiHqGrcPHXzGAFE+XcEdO+n7vI0lfgDY02A ACECewHU1YxoP97lon41KAfPiAqeg5c44Fju4= Received: by 10.216.85.85 with SMTP id t63mr140786wee.86.1277932651646; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 39sm8367028wet.43.2010.06.30.14.17.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:17:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Stable users: libpng-1.4 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:17:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201006292356.56520.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006292356.56520.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1301872.ARZOq52SI0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006302217.29690.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 46c0a617-f0af-4c35-aecd-866b91fd5cf6 X-Archives-Hash: 3ba4fe7a4c0ebeb5e3436443088cec65 --nextPart1301872.ARZOq52SI0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 29 June 2010 22:56:56 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Seems like the horrendous screw-up that was the libpng-1.4 update never g= ot > fixed properly and is hitting stable users now. >=20 > Flameeyes, in his usual in-your-face style, has documented what needs to = be > done: >=20 > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/06/29/stable-users-libpng-update >=20 > If you are a stable user, save yourself a lot of trouble over the next few > days, read his blog and do what he says. He has this uncanny ability of > almost always being correct on technical toolchain matters Blast! I emerged media-libs/libpng-1.4.3 only 2 days ago and ... I followe= d=20 what the elog told me which was to run the very scrip that Flameeyes says i= t=20 causes long term problems! O_O This is what I have in terms of libpng* (on an amd64 system): # ls -la /usr/lib/libpng* =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root root 236422 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib/libpng14.a =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root root 935 Jun 28 12:57 /usr/lib/libpng14.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib/libpng14.so ->=20 libpng14.so.14.3.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14 ->=20 libpng14.so.14.3.0 =2Drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 158400 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14.3.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib/libpng.a -> libpng14.a =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root root 935 Jun 28 12:57 /usr/lib/libpng.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib/libpng.so -> libpng14.so # ls -la /usr/lib64/libpng* =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root root 236422 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib64/libpng14.a =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root root 935 Jun 28 12:57 /usr/lib64/libpng14.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib64/libpng14.so ->=20 libpng14.so.14.3.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib64/libpng14.so.14 ->=20 libpng14.so.14.3.0 =2Drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 158400 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib64/libpng14.so.14.3.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib64/libpng.a -> libpng14.a =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root root 935 Jun 28 12:57 /usr/lib64/libpng.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jun 28 12:56 /usr/lib64/libpng.so -> libpng14= =2Eso Is this OK? What now? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1301872.ARZOq52SI0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwrtGkACgkQVTDTR3kpaLai7QCgheXmOdtVW8fYtxCHJWW577IC i+4AnRbaa84x5tNK9q9VPogiruzS/T2I =Vbbg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1301872.ARZOq52SI0--