From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OTk2z-0005gb-DE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:16:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FD10E0828; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.virtyou.com (mx.virtyou.com [94.23.166.77]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC41DE0828 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from weird.localnet (p4FF07A7D.dip.t-dialin.net [79.240.122.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.virtyou.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 237EA4A8010 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:16:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Alex Schuster To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here! Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:16:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-tuxonice-r2; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <1277766970.4c292d3a54f96@oo.vpn.blueboxsoft.pl> <20100629153805.5a6882cb@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <201006292340.39310.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006292340.39310.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006300116.45823.wonko@wonkology.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7485d702-4b46-44b8-a8da-30cb5cb3124e X-Archives-Hash: f66849faffdc37add203e2f309be23bc Mick writes: > On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:38:05 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > I used to be a big Konqueror fan until about six months ago. Then I > > tried Chromium and was blown away by its speed and the way it works > > on more sites. I do miss some of the integration of Konqueror and > > its kio-slaves and still use it for non-web duties. When the > > inevitable feature creep hits Chromium and it slows down, can see > > myself going back to Konqueror. I did not want to use Chromium, but I tried it, and I must admit, it's fast, and it uses much less memory than konqueror. And it even has web shortcuts, which are a must-have for me now. What I'm missing most now is mouse gestures. > I tried Chromium six months ago and it was not crashing, but couldn't > really tell the difference in speed from Opera for most sites. In > terms of performance it is Opera, FF, Konqueror here, with Konqueror > not managing some Javascripts at all. Opera, this might also be an idea. I never used it much, only in some cases when Konqueror had problems with web pags. > Alex, have you tried turning off the Nepomuke service? I see in one of > your screenshots that you are having problems with it (segfaults). No. The screenshot was taken shortly after logging in, the log shows the Strigi crashes. So I turned off Strigi, but kept Nepomuk. Wonko