From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OTjUT-0003bv-AJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:41:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08BCEE0B67; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88F7E0B67 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so128769wyb.40 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=pGlxV9JSOexFLP7a0IcEWwyozltITw+QV2fajOQ7//M=; b=tWVSCSwvUnAKiX2ZzlvlSKh+LZ2r5NHWLNDi3aUucB25Du//Dudpbnh8paQW/w3WLI a5XxFP/3hybeUOoAhWKH0lbnEwyBVoD/EP55VlWUEV0p5QYnkRyWdmgLfvNQb/Z40sqZ zB/m1t5pqwEcNqfCha/U2UfNAzFuMPA9pvaUE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=p7MFmgwuqdMdWQW3GP0GkGnVANH4Z6mnhqLobSun+qHy2yjPyzFg2gh3t7pK1A63Zt ecrUWtcATg/uPq/4V2TOVUYDBv6ABC3x12PfobQZXXzc9ZrJBRzgHvJy1uAoK2O6+j7h 25PnPdqACu5r5q8KyVaH0HFofjqA6LmB0mock= Received: by 10.216.160.70 with SMTP id t48mr10220480wek.82.1277851245331; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n52sm4656191wee.31.2010.06.29.15.40.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:40:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here! Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:40:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <1277766970.4c292d3a54f96@oo.vpn.blueboxsoft.pl> <201006291623.48783.wonko@wonkology.org> <20100629153805.5a6882cb@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100629153805.5a6882cb@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4201730.3PfGZZjOiK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006292340.39310.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 670cc952-8a41-4193-8b9a-a472bd0c5b70 X-Archives-Hash: 15e49c415d75629e5b36a938fb8fa1eb --nextPart4201730.3PfGZZjOiK Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:38:05 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:23:48 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: > > I tried chromium once, about half a year ago, but it crashed instantly. > > Emerging it again. But I like Konqueror very much. It has problems with > > some web sites, for those I use Firefox. I am missing some of Firefox' > > plugins, and it works much better with the new flash, but over all I > > like Konqueror's behaviour better. >=20 > I used to be a big Konqueror fan until about six months ago. Then I > tried Chromium and was blown away by its speed and the way it works on > more sites. I do miss some of the integration of Konqueror and its > kio-slaves and still use it for non-web duties. When the inevitable > feature creep hits Chromium and it slows down, can see myself going back > to Konqueror. I tried Chromium six months ago and it was not crashing, but couldn't reall= y=20 tell the difference in speed from Opera for most sites. In terms of=20 performance it is Opera, FF, Konqueror here, with Konqueror not managing so= me=20 Javascripts at all. Alex, have you tried turning off the Nepomuke service? I see in one of you= r=20 screenshots that you are having problems with it (segfaults). =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4201730.3PfGZZjOiK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwqdmcACgkQVTDTR3kpaLb+YgCgzJJop/U+BJFMlkRBeN7rwVS1 WQoAn246mgKXGM33n7V1tj8MdJQPP/tW =N7b8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4201730.3PfGZZjOiK--