From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSc3U-0004rx-0D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:32:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73ED8E0BD4; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C36E0BD4 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:31:56 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArkGABYBJkxFpZsG/2dsb2JhbACSeIwucr85gngBgisEhmWDSYM8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,487,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="68954579" Received: from 69-165-155-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([69.165.155.6]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with SMTP; 26 Jun 2010 16:31:39 -0400 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:31:27 -0400 From: waltdnes@waltdnes.org Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:31:27 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc build fails during emerge system on new 64-bit install Message-ID: <20100626203127.GA3594@waltdnes.org> References: <20100623233324.GA11305@waltdnes.org> <201006242138.18010.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20100625032909.GC13054@waltdnes.org> <4C24424F.3070405@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C24424F.3070405@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 4f4317d8-b1ac-4f96-98cd-73d7ebf58ddb X-Archives-Hash: 7a1e5691b6858fcbb67af3e4e9cc98dd On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:44:47AM -0500, Dale wrote > For future reference, after you switch gcc, you should run env-update > and source /etc/profile. Then you don't have to log out and back in > again. One could argue that one is easier than the other tho. ;-) I knew I had to do a couple of things if I wanted to avoid logout and login, but I couldn't remember off the top of my head. It was easier to just log out+in rather than look it up. -- Walter Dnes