From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSDTC-0007r5-G1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:17:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9347FE09F0; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (forum.psychotherapie.org [217.160.22.205]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42635E09F0 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (8.13.3/8.13.3) with UUCP id o5PIHEc0029764 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:17:14 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id o5PIA8Ot004373 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:10:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:10:08 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious Message-ID: <20100625181008.GC21445@nibiru.local> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof X-Archives-Salt: 8a8642b2-b0cb-4cff-b8fa-4080e98473f9 X-Archives-Hash: 8ae0642c85921b1e35ac1425664db536 * Arttu V. wrote: > On 6/20/10, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > > For some reason, the latest x86 stable p7zip wants to force me to remove > > 'odbc' from wxGTK. This seems wrong, and I'm masking it out for the moment, > > but I'm wondering what justification there is. > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267698 Yet another case of different packages bundled into one ;-p When looking at the rather complex ebuild, I'd claim that upstream is not well-designed (so distros have to do things which naturally would be upstream's job) .... ;-o cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------