From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OO5ZZ-0007WL-C4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:03:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F09BE0C89 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B8DE09BE for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9D7C4CBC3B for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:34:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:34:28 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? Message-ID: <20100614093428.6547ede6@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100613233744.4ed3d923@karnak.local> References: <20100613233744.4ed3d923@karnak.local> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs9 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/p=HucwIeAG8rAmGC8pCJ4T/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f354cd94-b6f4-4270-af69-a94fa96def21 X-Archives-Hash: 64b9eabbb615edff8697e301ff840591 --Sig_/p=HucwIeAG8rAmGC8pCJ4T/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:37:44 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > >Dovecot will store them where you tell it to. You could have easily > >stored them all in a single directory like /var/virtual/mail/user, or > >even used a hashed directory scheme (which might be desirable for very > >large installations like ISPs)... =20 >=20 > IIRC, that means that I have to give universal write access, perhaps > with a "sticky" bit, on that directory.=20 You don't, you only have to make it group writeable by mail, although I don't think that is absolutely necessary. Each user's mail is kept in a separate subdirectory, so they only need access to their own directory. --=20 Neil Bothwick Don't count the days, make the days count. --Sig_/p=HucwIeAG8rAmGC8pCJ4T/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwV6ZoACgkQum4al0N1GQMvkQCeI1qA5gOdexiHdd4ryncZ/Lty T+YAoI6ld1K3giD08QoAdCwrBYEJxcU6 =xMdQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/p=HucwIeAG8rAmGC8pCJ4T/--