From: David W Noon <dwnoon@ntlworld.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:35:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100612123547.491fdec0@karnak.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eUoaR-7XR-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1062 bytes --]
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 04:00:01 +0200, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote about
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
>while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
>somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
>I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
>
>Any better program for that task?
I bit the bullet a few years ago and installed an IMAP4 server --
initially Dovecot, but quickly replaced by dbmail. This allows you to
use a sieve script, instead of procmail "recipes". Moreover, each user
maintains his/her own sieve script.
So, my mail path is now:
1) fetchmail, from my ISP's POP3 server;
2) postfix, including spam and virus scanning with amavisd-new;
3) dbmail, for local IMAP4 delivery.
I am proud to say it is the best "home brew" mail system I have ever
seen.
--
Regards,
Dave [RLU #314465]
======================================================================
dwnoon@ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
======================================================================
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-12 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <eUoaR-7XR-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-06-12 11:35 ` David W Noon [this message]
2010-06-12 19:32 ` [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? Stroller
[not found] <eUGhs-Yv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eUGhs-Yv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eUGhs-Yv-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eUGhs-Yv-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eUZWO-4jP-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-06-13 22:37 ` David W Noon
2010-06-14 8:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-06-14 11:15 ` Tanstaafl
2010-06-14 13:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-06-14 13:51 ` Tanstaafl
[not found] <eUxea-4y0-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eUxea-4y0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <eUEIF-73A-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-06-12 21:17 ` David W Noon
2010-06-13 17:53 ` Tanstaafl
2010-06-12 1:55 meino.cramer
2010-06-12 6:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-06-12 10:15 ` Peter Schuller
2010-06-12 12:18 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-06-12 13:37 ` Enrico Weigelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100612123547.491fdec0@karnak.local \
--to=dwnoon@ntlworld.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox