* [gentoo-user] Blurred bold characters in urxvt
@ 2010-06-05 18:13 Mick
2010-06-05 19:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2010-06-05 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 291 bytes --]
Hi All,
I emerged rxvt-unicode because aterm which I have been using faithfully for
years does not do UTF8, but as you can see in the attachment all bold
characters look distorted. In xterm and aterm they look nice and clear when
bold.
How can I fix this?
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #1.2: urxvt_blurred.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 89173 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Blurred bold characters in urxvt
2010-06-05 18:13 [gentoo-user] Blurred bold characters in urxvt Mick
@ 2010-06-05 19:09 ` Mick
2010-06-07 12:52 ` Joshua Murphy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2010-06-05 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 721 bytes --]
On Saturday 05 June 2010 19:13:24 Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I emerged rxvt-unicode because aterm which I have been using faithfully for
> years does not do UTF8, but as you can see in the attachment all bold
> characters look distorted. In xterm and aterm they look nice and clear
> when bold.
>
> How can I fix this?
It seems that it was a limitation of the fixed font that I had defined for
aterm in .Xresources:
aterm*font:-*-fixed-*-*-*-*-20-*-100-*-*-*-*-*
Setting a different font and using xft seems to overcome this problem:
/usr/bin/urxvt -pe tabbed -fn "x:Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:pixelsize=15"
No idea why aterm copes with fixed font and urxvt does not ...
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Blurred bold characters in urxvt
2010-06-05 19:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
@ 2010-06-07 12:52 ` Joshua Murphy
2010-06-07 13:19 ` Mick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Murphy @ 2010-06-07 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 05 June 2010 19:13:24 Mick wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I emerged rxvt-unicode because aterm which I have been using faithfully for
>> years does not do UTF8, but as you can see in the attachment all bold
>> characters look distorted. In xterm and aterm they look nice and clear
>> when bold.
>>
>> How can I fix this?
>
> It seems that it was a limitation of the fixed font that I had defined for
> aterm in .Xresources:
>
> aterm*font:-*-fixed-*-*-*-*-20-*-100-*-*-*-*-*
>
> Setting a different font and using xft seems to overcome this problem:
>
> /usr/bin/urxvt -pe tabbed -fn "x:Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:pixelsize=15"
>
> No idea why aterm copes with fixed font and urxvt does not ...
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
The 'why' I can answer. Aterm doesn't do antialiasing for the fonts
while urxvt does, and the 'fixed' font wasn't made to be able to
handle antialiasing cleanly.
--
Poison [BLX]
Joshua M. Murphy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Blurred bold characters in urxvt
2010-06-07 12:52 ` Joshua Murphy
@ 2010-06-07 13:19 ` Mick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2010-06-07 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 7 June 2010 13:52, Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday 05 June 2010 19:13:24 Mick wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I emerged rxvt-unicode because aterm which I have been using faithfully for
>>> years does not do UTF8, but as you can see in the attachment all bold
>>> characters look distorted. In xterm and aterm they look nice and clear
>>> when bold.
>>>
>>> How can I fix this?
>>
>> It seems that it was a limitation of the fixed font that I had defined for
>> aterm in .Xresources:
>>
>> aterm*font:-*-fixed-*-*-*-*-20-*-100-*-*-*-*-*
>>
>> Setting a different font and using xft seems to overcome this problem:
>>
>> /usr/bin/urxvt -pe tabbed -fn "x:Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:pixelsize=15"
>>
>> No idea why aterm copes with fixed font and urxvt does not ...
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Mick
>
> The 'why' I can answer. Aterm doesn't do antialiasing for the fonts
> while urxvt does, and the 'fixed' font wasn't made to be able to
> handle antialiasing cleanly.
Thanks, it makes sense now.
--
Regards,
Mick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-07 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-05 18:13 [gentoo-user] Blurred bold characters in urxvt Mick
2010-06-05 19:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
2010-06-07 12:52 ` Joshua Murphy
2010-06-07 13:19 ` Mick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox