From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OJbz3-0001zP-SB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:39:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 894CAE0FB1; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCBCE0FB1 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D25925048CA for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:37:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:37:46 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to verify stable system after fsck corrections Message-ID: <20100602013746.1388c14e@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201006020006.02827.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> References: <4C04D6F9.6040106@gmail.com> <20100601232137.5e5dc91b@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <201006020006.02827.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs9 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/FEvqyxCrUBEEu8NxWnFBhtK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c22d6a9b-ebeb-433f-9e59-9c3eef8323b9 X-Archives-Hash: 72c0cc920085d047002f49e5f84cafe8 --Sig_/FEvqyxCrUBEEu8NxWnFBhtK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > I ran it and many .la files are found. I guess this is because of > > > 'lafilefixer', and they should not be considered as corrupted. =20 > >=20 > > Correct. =20 >=20 > So if I run lafilefixer, equery check is essentially useless - at > least, I can't undertake to spot the one problem among the 221 false > positives I get from running it. You can't but grep can. --=20 Neil Bothwick "What I need is a list of specific unknown problems we will encounter." --Sig_/FEvqyxCrUBEEu8NxWnFBhtK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwFp+AACgkQum4al0N1GQNQMwCgy5YGInJZDjpD/bxuUuU+gsnT Io8An3XTEjt//PgGh2pn344ABiE5bOm/ =f3fE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FEvqyxCrUBEEu8NxWnFBhtK--