From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OJaXt-0001IW-6U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:06:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49438E0FD6; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 23:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E613E0FD6 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 23:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF63DEF27 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4B1cqfR0o77 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1798CDEF0A for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:04 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to verify stable system after fsck corrections Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C04D6F9.6040106@gmail.com> <20100601232137.5e5dc91b@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100601232137.5e5dc91b@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006020006.02827.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 646107d7-7894-4235-b188-fa01f9963ad4 X-Archives-Hash: a49b8c952a8da1a62ee9c166b480860e On Tuesday 01 June 2010 23:21:37 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:55:27 +0200, Nicolas Richard wrote: > > > Note that it will show failures on any files that have been > > > modified since installation, such as configuration and data > > > files, so you'll have to check these manually, but if a library > > > or executable shows up you almost certainly have a problem. > > > > I ran it and many .la files are found. I guess this is because of > > 'lafilefixer', and they should not be considered as corrupted. > > Correct. So if I run lafilefixer, equery check is essentially useless - at least, I can't undertake to spot the one problem among the 221 false positives I get from running it. -- Rgds Peter.