From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OGJCf-0003YQ-Hj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 21:59:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62368E07A6; Sun, 23 May 2010 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C69E0853 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1788577wyf.40 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:58:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=W4kq4CWaSTuYQjbYwcPS12zhx04sP4sGqotb/jm4Dqo=; b=jJHj2hMxnoJg0tnHPOBHzivcoX8m48J5HKreQuoi04Dq624+/grxOQWjWyfHEOCqP3 RcYGN4J7xE1fyGKKf6g7YICwyorh4LphTNVGsbOrt9Nf8FhSESY9XGlNr1XdIDKV4GYA GDDJUd1ZphPC5Ep6Th4yxaYEdjg595fEG6FbM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Ss0BgAvjcF0kZ40rvO19SkRwek9D+rxMwpTw3dr6X9Eq2htuAS8Ml9fR1+h93JM6rd szF6RM/8zLEiZVJznHOU8Mjt4dDKQipHQz2fP9aKcpibEHmRvVyDzxzQGFWbs/tRQoJn i9AutSQnLNbdFp4/1NnR8LzBrYCEE3NJa0dj8= Received: by 10.227.138.18 with SMTP id y18mr4357551wbt.198.1274651903563; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h22sm26535265wbh.9.2010.05.23.14.58.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 23 May 2010 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED: Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 22:57:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4BF53BE8.4040104@xunil.at> <4BF99226.4050701@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: <4BF99226.4050701@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3186364.ymKeELY8Ij"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005232258.19962.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: fd97530d-08bb-418d-9170-14e23c6bb80e X-Archives-Hash: 8a6a7e91a341b12a9ee4aa0abbebf7aa --nextPart3186364.ymKeELY8Ij Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 23 May 2010 21:37:58 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Don't ask ... I was really perfectly positive back then that there was > no newline in my decrypted key (I even used grep, yes) ... today there > was one ... *sigh* >=20 > The posting on: >=20 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D318865 >=20 > pointed me at another hint from Jan which now helped me to use my > encrypted volume with pam_mount-2.1 at last. >=20 > Thanks for all your suggestions and help ... sorry for all the noise ... Since we were subjected to all this noise (no problem for me, I found the=20 thread interesting, albeit undecipherable! Pun intended =3D) can you pleas= e=20 explain why a new line breaks the openssl key? I have an SSL pkcs12 certificate which I am trying to use with kmail and I= =20 can't decrypt it no matter what encryption passphrase I set up. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart3186364.ymKeELY8Ij Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkv5pPsACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYVbQCfcZKgnpuiqe9IjLM0ipIrcMRV BJIAoMSR7ziA4lBv036vtn6GnnH4mJgs =hnJj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3186364.ymKeELY8Ij--