From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OGERH-0006SC-Mq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 16:54:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD020E07B6; Sun, 23 May 2010 16:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.osagesoftware.com (osagesoftware.com [216.144.204.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DF4E07B6 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 16:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from osage.osagesoftware.com (osage.osagesoftware.com [192.168.1.10]) by mail.osagesoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D701668; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:53:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 12:53:37 -0400 From: David Relson To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: arttuv69@gmail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem Message-ID: <20100523125337.268f6a2b@osage.osagesoftware.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20100522161039.2c52d639@osage.osagesoftware.com> <20100523092457.6f5773a7@osage.osagesoftware.com> <20100523105710.556f469b@osage.osagesoftware.com> Organization: Osage Software Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e8821c66-926d-4b81-8705-7b1d685d7fb3 X-Archives-Hash: ee3dde0c9d523f420f5c45d21121c57e On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:16:53 +0300 Arttu V. wrote: > On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote: > > Hi Arttu, > > > > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but > > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result. > > Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild speculation. > > Next idea, how about just marking a single arch: > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" Wonder how that got there? I must have been in a creative mood when I did that. The extra arch has been removed, but didn't help matters ... > I don't know if the java ebuilds, eclasses and wrapper-scripts are > wise enough to figure out the correct dependencies with such keywords. > I could imagine some part might figure out the arch as x86, but then > your system vm would be set to the x86_64 vm, i.e., no x86 system vm > set ... (again, just some more wild speculation ;) ) Have started "emerge -auNDtqv world". Emerge has found a bunch of packages to downgrade, including several java related ones. I'll report back later (after a family picnic this afternoon). Regards, David