From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O9ixK-0007sr-5h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 18:04:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52492E0810 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 18:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5023EE077F for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 17:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F8DD5E46CA for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 18:08:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 18:08:39 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs Message-ID: <20100505180839.15addb99@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4BE19FE1.6070101@konstantinhansen.de> References: <4BE19FE1.6070101@konstantinhansen.de> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs2 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/4+PwEu7Ws2ejAinys2k1TX4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6dc89181-e08d-489f-ac0c-4edea2bce6eb X-Archives-Hash: 0da8a39731634db231470de3c9107a01 --Sig_/4+PwEu7Ws2ejAinys2k1TX4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:42:09 +0200, KH wrote: > net-fs/mount-cifs ("net-fs/mount-cifs" is blocking net-fs/samba-3.4.6) mount.cifs is now provided by Samba. > Somba is pulled in by the samba use-flag. The PC only is "client" to a=20 > server running samba. Do I need samba for this anymore? More specific=20 > (don't want to hear "moo"): Will I be able to mount a samba partition=20 > without setting the samba use flag and after unmerging samba? Samba is the server. The client tools used to be a separate package but it now looks like you should emerge samba with USE=3D"-server smbclient". --=20 Neil Bothwick Home is where you hang your @. --Sig_/4+PwEu7Ws2ejAinys2k1TX4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvhpigACgkQum4al0N1GQM/MgCfZBoYy29tQvcUsPm5FxljKhmI 5sUAn2veVFqYNyX1Bm6zNCfdavoDj8ph =5/oT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4+PwEu7Ws2ejAinys2k1TX4--