From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-109506-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NxiFb-0005jX-Cq
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:53:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4619E07D6;
	Fri,  2 Apr 2010 14:52:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.150])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA6DE07D6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Apr 2010 14:52:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so680041qwc.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=xQXYiAnlxJudIuiR9Z7KV5Bw8bluLDeCa+rop7oLTn0=;
        b=erhZi6OL0z2R5o2aA0uOuVoQ7RHNEaqjbfxtpA8exa2Vfj2juJvTvy25Q1AnLbfSeH
         gWUleLKML4LXhsTBd1TAY3219LadAlDsIupqtnM8yiQwDGnAg6fQrYeUzIYSagCbYP7o
         IT5T65RJin92zpYNeRa2tFi/Wy9N32mKAQvuU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=TPT/Rcget7qjm5xaaO9o0rxzC/OX4OW559EQfz+WDOY0/CftIbaZz+XOXPmppuAjrR
         YJ7+7L40sZeD/s87aO64GAUslnPAIDAPFsCB8kEHOQsgbEmmu9hhYnpHWy5bUTbUKRhn
         QKTWklt6YgHZdPgmbi6zsCYPMhxrBwiutyDiE=
Received: by 10.224.87.106 with SMTP id v42mr627346qal.23.1270219965221;
        Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from energy.localnet ([72.14.241.7])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm4943093qyk.9.2010.04.02.07.52.43
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT:Choosing a filesystem
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 16:52:40 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.33r4; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; )
References: <20100401174711.GA5120@solfire> <201004021445.29441.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <1270214003.13878.30.camel@rattus>
In-Reply-To: <1270214003.13878.30.camel@rattus>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201004021652.40360.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 8f4f8e4e-bfb3-48fa-bb7c-a1bcd5d21011
X-Archives-Hash: 9dd68480d1de3fb77e266ff8268772b8

On Freitag 02 April 2010, William Kenworthy wrote:

> My experience was with raid 0, while the higher raid redundancy will
> shift the reliability figures back the other way.

wrong. Raid0 is meant for 0 redudancy and reduced reliability for more 
performance.

Before you start talking about Raid and redundandy you should read about raid 
levels and what they mean first.