From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NvSh3-0001Qg-Nb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:52:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84A1AE0977; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DCEE0977 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59B8157002E for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:51:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:51:18 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] f-spot depends on mono? Message-ID: <20100327095118.2e45955a@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201003270250.40453.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> References: <53e35fd51003250831u243f7a26rd15e45af50d46eb6@mail.gmail.com> <201003261539.52108.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <20100326225731.7cca185c@digimed.co.uk> <201003270250.40453.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5cvs38 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ZR8WeVn=31G47wv.U6IyUxw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e9118a7b-f4fa-4170-a323-e5ddd09134a9 X-Archives-Hash: 3c05516c682e5320147f11c32b3cb49b --Sig_/ZR8WeVn=31G47wv.U6IyUxw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:50:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > Redhat always was gnome shop for no good reasons at all. =20 > >=20 > > Wasn't it because of the not-very-free licensing of QT at the time? =20 >=20 > and that was how many years ago? Inertia has no sell by date :( --=20 Neil Bothwick She's fine, upstanding, and wonderful laying down. --Sig_/ZR8WeVn=31G47wv.U6IyUxw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkut1RwACgkQum4al0N1GQNW3QCgtECCYb8tuqpNjZ1fNIK38P7C LS4AoMBkWWjcFXfCnTKRbgM5oX1krhQs =X59u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ZR8WeVn=31G47wv.U6IyUxw--