From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu6bd-0005Tf-Sx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:05:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B67E09D2; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682EAE09D2 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so867641fxm.30 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=cMvYAuETuOU6kKvdfnDBfi5sk8dLNeLC39jwuRh+B5c=; b=LwNZGrljpKgxAEOuhlzjKYESKrcERl/8KN+T1iHMpdCEmAPVQ5h6yXl7UZq2vm/ysR 96umlxv0Lkmj9glVbrWGNF7yEqLo3QggsVcWvloy26kSs+GT/TUJDaLbcHJ+kRkJCMnN SETAll6a2+hcxozWr/Plxs7Eba6Z1eLFen2ds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=jw3s+qAxirAvSN1BLUR3S2jDjJZ2ynGI3+U/rWw8QfHoKgzVzi15PAe4PX928jA12K uBGns6wTxo8m22UUgAa2DBJvkjc9LnFoRfePNHk+EVHZZcpX/0qbW7dGaL4bP4mcA1IE 42HIYapfU6grc+zw9n4cuvKwSqEKiLObQhkms= Received: by 10.204.34.194 with SMTP id m2mr4523972bkd.106.1269360268849; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g18sm27065313bkw.19.2010.03.23.09.04.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:04:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with script calling OOCalc on amd64 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:04:04 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo-r10; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201003152342.12044.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201003191914.32202.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201003231018.59630.steve@st4vs.net> In-Reply-To: <201003231018.59630.steve@st4vs.net> Cc: Steve Dommett Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3023665.59uL5ek2K1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003231604.32848.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 8da1a7e5-06ae-4936-896f-63e67d3225ce X-Archives-Hash: 74a041ac06284a8b8eddad341dc4aa35 --nextPart3023665.59uL5ek2K1 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 23 March 2010 10:18:59 Steve Dommett wrote: > On Friday 19 March 2010 19:14:21 Mick wrote: > > I also tried /usr/bin/oocalc, but it didn't work. :-( >=20 > Try: > oocalc -no-oosplash >=20 > :-) Yes! That fixed it. :-) Thank you very much. I saw this option but never thought that it would make any difference on th= e=20 terminal behaviour. Do you know why it behaves differently with -no- oosplash, when the binary installation does not seem to be bothered either= =20 way? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart3023665.59uL5ek2K1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuo5pAACgkQVTDTR3kpaLaQ1wCgmTBXuwU7ye6WbSusoLO7ogE9 PqEAoKqyx0kkqdqv4tnnsgESbGptvPVt =Czj+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3023665.59uL5ek2K1--