From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NqQ8p-0008LI-Iv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:08:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30C9AE0C26 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09CFE0864 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 202E85A54AE for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:13:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:13:46 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Only two people in the gentoo world is having this problem? Message-ID: <20100313111346.5108e63a@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100313022623.GA9917@waltdnes.org> References: <47a330c51003100028w11a44a61pdcba1e0b41c5cb5c@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003110703x4a891508ib2a38ed3afff9ac6@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b1003110751h28866137j3c20e69dceb99a61@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120005q2c7dda47w286d340387e4fa11@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120034x4e9037feld530642989da5191@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120523n61a9d94dq58d132c50e1fae00@mail.gmail.com> <20100312135744.28734e36@digimed.co.uk> <20100313022623.GA9917@waltdnes.org> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5cvs33 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/gGFt18xpsnZdtgezJ0CdoRQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 52f70ce8-c195-47bb-8b29-97fba2977070 X-Archives-Hash: 324b27fdf506af318f3a876c5b088bc4 --Sig_/gGFt18xpsnZdtgezJ0CdoRQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:26:23 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > > It probably means you have run fix_libtool_files.sh, or possibly > > lafilefixer, between installing and removing the package responsible > > for that file. Emerge won't remove files it installed if they have > > been subsequently modified. =20 >=20 > Do they warn about > it?=20 No, it's a simple rule: if portage didn't put the file there, portage won't remove it. It is also a sensible rule (IMO) but it can lead to .la files being orphaned (which is more a problem with the whole .la thing). I'd rather that than have portage delete my customisations. --=20 Neil Bothwick Last yur I kudnt spel modjerater now I are won. --Sig_/gGFt18xpsnZdtgezJ0CdoRQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkubc2oACgkQum4al0N1GQMzfACg01Td+6/DQlLPRyRNEVHvTFvq xQAAoLQI+2gvr/ekUyo471Ye28QRcvLF =ff1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gGFt18xpsnZdtgezJ0CdoRQ--