From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq5NB-0006p6-Vf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:57:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 047C3E0B07; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF01FE0B07 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D9724C84A7 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:57:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:57:44 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Only two people in the gentoo world is having this problem? Message-ID: <20100312135744.28734e36@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <47a330c51003120523n61a9d94dq58d132c50e1fae00@mail.gmail.com> References: <47a330c51003100028w11a44a61pdcba1e0b41c5cb5c@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003110703x4a891508ib2a38ed3afff9ac6@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b1003110751h28866137j3c20e69dceb99a61@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120005q2c7dda47w286d340387e4fa11@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120034x4e9037feld530642989da5191@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120523n61a9d94dq58d132c50e1fae00@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5cvs33 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/mu=VG/Uw_/LNTzXxTctHS._"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6814ce10-81dd-4f9a-8264-ef5a5563ea61 X-Archives-Hash: 9734cf5c6bd7ca35bf8ecef5ffc18f03 --Sig_/mu=VG/Uw_/LNTzXxTctHS._ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:23:51 +0100, Damian wrote: > Indeed. libarchive.la is not owned by any package. Is this a symptom > of a bigger problem? It probably means you have run fix_libtool_files.sh, or possibly lafilefixer, between installing and removing the package responsible for that file. Emerge won't remove files it installed if they have been subsequently modified. --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 31: Small crowd --Sig_/mu=VG/Uw_/LNTzXxTctHS._ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuaSFgACgkQum4al0N1GQMp0ACfRbHzVL1VA/2M6dGEJJMtIX59 HlgAniFL0jX9V3x745n5qH3zCYZHMCtV =PA6H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mu=VG/Uw_/LNTzXxTctHS._--