From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NochZ-0002jB-PL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:08:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CE46E07C3; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.150]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82E5E07C3 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so622339eyb.40 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:08:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=IehKbtZ7kC3VvWT/CtEH5WVDpBgBFObpKiyswrX5fh8=; b=ksnp6gHThXssEsLV4ohHRam5tkwnNSZXxFJIHvnGM+h8kQDFkk3MjcHkN78yGPzJyV Vva+57f7b2IffJa0WtmJkxruBffhGvPLuKUd2nwZuGN8qoFcHhDd+0p1cLANBxICR1s4 EG03iRZwwsos1DJCPtMrAn+Fz9SteMillKVJk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=TGAQ3+OvJpGCM/L3cNwVwFLvY+pYZVimmqsVLRhONPUCj7/ajKx2V0siu0+TwCyIp2 oOg6HC1imG183JDYqJoPJt1+aZ2BhL2HEmWT9GlSoV03OUoGVH4JAkBKanrr4nkQg6Y8 ThX/41Yw/QZolsHPXzQhgcjtxAgAwC4l+nQYY= Received: by 10.213.2.79 with SMTP id 15mr3127809ebi.96.1268053706170; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm2291983ewy.13.2010.03.08.05.08.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:08:24 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple Update Issues - what order should things be done? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:05:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4B9156ED.1050407@libertytrek.org> <201003072017.18625.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4B94F11D.50008@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <4B94F11D.50008@libertytrek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003081505.43563.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: fbea0e7d-4c69-4e1a-a87d-35202d1d0527 X-Archives-Hash: 893461dcd9e98e0e0c540c2bada610e2 On Monday 08 March 2010 14:44:13 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-03-07 1:17 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Saturday 06 March 2010 20:39:05 Tanstaafl wrote: > >> Baselayout2 is still not stable, so, yes, I'm still on baselayout1, > >> and now you've gone and made me nervous again. ;) > >> > >> > >> > >> Are you suggesting I should already be using it?? > > > > You are going to have to switch sometime, the day will come when > > baselayout-2 goes stable. > > Any idea how far away this might be? Are we talking a year or more? It feels like baselayout-2 and openrc have been in ~arch for a year or more, so there's no telling when it will move to stable. I haven't seen any indication from the dev either. In other words, only that dev knows what his plans are. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com