From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnMmG-0007e8-HI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:56:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC07E0B4E; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B555E0B4E for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:56:04 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAPbzj0tMCpbj/2dsb2JhbACbRHS3cYR9BIMXh3I X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,584,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="57563190" Received: from 76-10-150-227.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([76.10.150.227]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with SMTP; 04 Mar 2010 20:56:03 -0500 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:52:01 -0500 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:52:01 -0500 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Advice for 64-bit n00b? Message-ID: <20100305015201.GA5102@waltdnes.org> References: <008DDC13-5883-4155-A996-64325EFCAA77@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <201003032204.17232.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201003032251.10918.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201003032356.12636.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <87iq9cpovo.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <3BB5376C-2909-484D-8780-F9E492754C19@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BB5376C-2909-484D-8780-F9E492754C19@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: e7bfaf2b-6027-4efc-9aa7-1330fc2fcfaf X-Archives-Hash: 32484b3dac7cc0d85aea5f6d86e6ae93 On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:56:34AM +0000, Stroller wrote > I could imagine that web-browsers might need 32-bit support in order > to play Flash If you're brave, there's an alpha (as in pre-beta, not the CPU) 64-bit plugin for linux at... http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html > but can you suggest other applications which might? Realplayer, or any other proprietary plugin. -- Walter Dnes