From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Advice for 64-bit n00b?
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:16:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003040916.31490.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hmnmul$1l4$1@dough.gmane.org>
On Donnerstag 04 März 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 08:44 AM, Graham Murray wrote:
> > Volker Armin Hemmann<volkerarmin@googlemail.com> writes:
> >> no, it is not safe to have a 64bit only system. Just choose the multilib
> >> profile and start installing. If something needs the 32bit emul libs, it
> >> will pull the stuff in. There is nothing you need to care about.
> >
> > What is unsafe about a 64bit only system? Surely if it were unsafe then
> > Gentoo would not offer no-multilib profiles? I have recently built 2
> > systems using a no-multilib profile and have not found any problems, and
> > expect to start building a third one today.
>
> You didn't understand the question Volker was replying to. The question
> was not about "safe" as in "security", but rather "safe" as in "I can
> rest assured that a no-multilib system can run every software I could
> install", which is clearly not the case since some applications need
> 32-bit support.
exactly. As Alan explained, there might be a point where you need to run a
32bit app.
Maybe some legacy game (Civilization Call To Power comes to mind) or some new-
but-the-vendor-sucks software.
Without multilib you can either choose not to use that software (which isn't a
choice if you really need it) or you can reinstall everything.
And all that for a couple of megabytes on a tens, maybe hundreds of gigabytes
harddisk.
du -h /usr/lib32
362M /usr/lib32
but:
rootfs 57G 23G 34G 41% /
yeah, shocking. Almost a 114th of the harddisk used for multilib stuff ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-04 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 15:29 [gentoo-user] Advice for 64-bit n00b? Stroller
2010-03-03 15:32 ` Alan McKinnon
2010-03-03 17:04 ` Stroller
2010-03-03 20:04 ` Alan McKinnon
2010-03-03 22:50 ` Mick
2010-03-03 22:56 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-03-04 6:44 ` Graham Murray
2010-03-04 7:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-03-04 8:16 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2010-03-04 8:56 ` Stroller
2010-03-04 9:15 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-03-04 12:02 ` Mick
2010-03-05 1:52 ` Walter Dnes
2010-03-04 7:23 ` [gentoo-user] " Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-04 7:30 ` Alan McKinnon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003040916.31490.volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox