From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmujI-0006el-Ss for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:59:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8CFBE0B61; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD1E0B61 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1416275ewy.26 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:59:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=gsQpgb/w669IoJSMqHeTrHqW9TtTCBkC51BCOlz8Ddg=; b=xkI7280XeSjqJ2snuLBGNvCRb2Y5/99TpdZHGT8DBoHxXyY/bTtUi14DZAtKlu3993 zkChWer+4Es6QuCHxyqXUEv0wphnL99DOEBn5UW3imX/zeFmWPSVx3ru8mZxZNlOcTt9 tWRdPeuTWLnHFtpVoJyf/8s8oAdhq3///9vg8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=AN3/dbcVSn6dOU8rnFmss/Ow4ytf4kVFKTbA9ffEhVLdW+Sj0CMwr5BR7Vyy6j6hDC GdCUTnC7eavw9RqHmdk/tnp+k+YJahTZsN2HgEnW6A9wv6/0BBMwiOV8N8Yv+W8XuoPP 0kUl3pERhvyhuNncH2/PQhUhBpA3GGgMYPNKA= Received: by 10.213.109.92 with SMTP id i28mr1794906ebp.63.1267646355775; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:59:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-238-8.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.238.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm17768166eyf.43.2010.03.03.11.59.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:59:14 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here! Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:56:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <9acccfe51002231827q26e94e64s7f29ec46b6675156@mail.gmail.com> <201003031849.31718.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <58965d8a1003030932q4f54868fk45483fb62c261cfc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58965d8a1003030932q4f54868fk45483fb62c261cfc@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003032156.39005.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 95c43a57-68f0-4663-85c9-f077cb677f69 X-Archives-Hash: d4321e368eaf2251243de6e4c1c37a6b On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:32:57 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk > > indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it > > itself. > > AFAIK it is on the Amarok to-do list now that the speed is good enough > to replace mysql, but nobody has volunteered to take on the challenge > yet. > > I think there's also the potential problem of users who don't install > or enable the indexing/semantic-desktop stuff might not be able to use > Amarok then... It could be a build-time option, giving the user a choice -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com