From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmsmo-000878-EX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:55:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B527E0BB9; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.askja.de (mail.askja.de [83.137.103.136]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611C0E0BB9 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static-87-79-89-40.netcologne.de ([87.79.89.40] helo=zone.wonkology.org) by mail.askja.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmsma-0006LA-RT for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:54:52 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by zone.wonkology.org with local; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:54:50 +0100 id 00011CA1.4B8EA26A.00007981 From: Alex Schuster To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here! Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:54:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.32-tuxonice-r5; KDE/4.4.0; i686; ; ) References: <9acccfe51002231827q26e94e64s7f29ec46b6675156@mail.gmail.com> <201003031227.46989.wonko@wonkology.org> <201003031849.31718.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201003031849.31718.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003031854.47945.wonko@wonkology.org> X-Archives-Salt: c589a766-3154-4825-88b9-fd29304ab125 X-Archives-Hash: b334ff544dac1f1a214ebcbd19146538 Alan McKinnon writes: > On Wednesday 03 March 2010 13:27:45 Alex Schuster wrote: [RANT RANT RANT] > > Ah, I see the problem. It mainly scans /data/mp3/incoming, a > > directory I have NOT selected as collection folder (but most other > > directories in /data/mp3 are selected). Still, those files do not > > show up in my collection, which is fine - some time ago amarok did > > index all in /data/mp3, even if a directory was not selected. I investigated this further. Amarok seems to look for all playlists below /data/mp3, and then looks up all of their files. No idea why. > I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk > indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it > itself. Strigi also keeps indexing parts of my /data/mp3 stuff with EVERY login. > OTOH, that might just resurrect the mother of all threads we had > recently - the one about the pros and cons of nepomuk and > semantic-desktop :-) I am pro, I like it, but again it seems those things are not yet working right. Strigi indexes stuff over and over again at every login. virtuoso-t then also runs for a while and hogs resources. dbus-daemon uses 10-15 percent of CPU time according to top. Should it do this? I enabled auto-login for KDE, so when I boot the system, at least things are already indexed when I start working with it. Now I'm going to emerge KDE-4.4.1, let's see what this will change. Wonko