From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkJhq-0006Ta-Ji for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:03:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D925E107A for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f215.google.com (mail-ew0-f215.google.com [209.85.219.215]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25C1E0F43 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so951953ewy.29 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:34:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=0c4JGm+4pAAxjj0uSrjJlRsOcKO2IV8kJg7n7V/HGug=; b=NCAJQg4phy3JcfeDW+uCSYkRuU9MATO4uUJrRy2vmONjEP8RhshQyogpFy+pb/Xgbl 43bQv6c1kkO/P8w//AOW3PR4wPkC0jhyf9orPNcZz6P/h9E9aPj1tqAFWcZNL1T6wTDD RSRpEodI3hl8ZZw2jgOCk6DFYOxQEdB59gxLI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=CBjl/6yVA6NDvyJpwXx9CGrsIMPMM3X7rgc1WpfokUTs7ZbiELNT6IbmcVDNPlXnKv dimjT5TMmQ3w+d8IhbkRujS5FGn6X+AyNTOa5K0EbZZ9aYsbU4vPiUUVIlXTU0I1SHja 9ludGKV0Wi9Ge4a5bPJgbJ1IIsrPRXxSyhhJE= Received: by 10.213.37.82 with SMTP id w18mr1134778ebd.97.1267025682037; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:34:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-153-205-rrdg-esr-2.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.153.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm888702ewy.6.2010.02.24.07.34.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:34:41 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE? Get me out of here! Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:32:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6; KDE/4.4.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <9acccfe51002231827q26e94e64s7f29ec46b6675156@mail.gmail.com> <92ad22481002240628x25cf03d2nf10b8f10ef4e4642@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201002241732.21426.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 8bc7b822-67b6-40c7-a1cd-99df5fe5a3ff X-Archives-Hash: b9a3901079c6fb9693650f581ee033ee On Wednesday 24 February 2010 16:46:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 02/24/2010 04:28 PM, Cr=C3=ADstian Viana wrote: > > there was a recent discussion about this on this mailing list: > > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_13c6d27e4216e91ed3c4800fe42b= 8e > > 95.xml > >=20 > > it seems only Kmail needs that USE flag. I also haven't tried this on my > > system. >=20 > Question is: will enabling that USE flag only for kdelibs result in KDE > in general using a "semantic desktop?" No. It means that kdelibs will support Nepomuk, whether individual apps do = so=20 or not is indeterminate. There are three possibilities for apps: 1. They build support for semantic desktop 2. They do not build support for semantic desktop 3. They can be configured to support or not support semantic desktop via USE Plus a 4th option: buggy code that does some weird combination of 1-3 or=20 perhaps something else altogether. To answer your question, you would have to audit all the KDE4 apps and add = up=20 the tally against points 1-3 (and maybe 4) =2D-=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com