From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nk13M-0002tz-Ar for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:08:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4BFFE0E5D for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803C9E0ADB for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC18C4B7789 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:36:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:36:37 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Graphical usenet client - alternative to Knode Message-ID: <20100223193637.0156c108@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <67701443-6E08-476C-AF00-5F6BB156E643@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20100223102617.50108832@digimed.co.uk> <20100223130834.36b0d95c@digimed.co.uk> <20100223165209.3120f1b0@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5cvs23 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/RgBEww.sYj7NY9CRKt9.jvL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2380e48b-b2dd-46c6-8b80-4bf0871dfb58 X-Archives-Hash: 2776a152a691d6d3fd9781471692b716 --Sig_/RgBEww.sYj7NY9CRKt9.jvL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:33:56 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > > No, I read them from a number of machines but using a single > > server that handles all the filtering too. =20 >=20 > Same here -- the only difference between the two approaches is > who's administering the server. You handle it yourself, I let > gmane do it. :) The main difference is that mine still works when my Internet connection is not available. And that all my mail is accessible from the same place, including mails I'd never put on a server owned by someone else. --=20 Neil Bothwick The law of Probability Dispersal decrees that whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed. --Sig_/RgBEww.sYj7NY9CRKt9.jvL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuELkoACgkQum4al0N1GQMxOACdH/Xed7VfzdAZRIS44/I/7/IP syIAoNlAO+3LfUK9ANdQoSamhrMx7LHW =QkCd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/RgBEww.sYj7NY9CRKt9.jvL--