From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NioKT-0001Q3-MT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:21:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC558E0504; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94451E0504 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so542306fge.10 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:20:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=OBUIB6zJGHMsSwVY5fKoR3y+qs5qIBRS6t1vFgqmRMQ=; b=fxLroX+Wrdi+ts3rm5qWaQAyTz0Zeoc+v2+op095bMO2GzCDetb0c/5ax+RQLYCH+Y PgDU/+ahf3qX/fDCn9v98OIGdpU/e+7b+TQIO83I/yV+BxE7GgHEH/0m1Iz4C0o0+hKX LQltQ/extx6N7Jv+4m4cf4FXEUk8jNEyqw+zw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=RKE9pau4ahRAws5ZfL0HFgDdR/hUnV71a1wQ1qOiyuvMG69TnwCDlXvHPmsAFOOfH2 gnyDoyFwjwWUMUR/iKMUWHGfegiYCDV+/lvtZlaq1WonwsWvVAma/yb3RLgcN+4GbLa0 yYinYDgR+Y6QEE5smaZCT6Ihunp2UVLXPGklg= Received: by 10.103.76.22 with SMTP id d22mr8965877mul.79.1266668432802; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from energy.localnet (ip-80-226-1-7.vodafone-net.de [80.226.1.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n10sm5488148mue.14.2010.02.20.04.20.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:20:32 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How should I clean up my broken system? Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:20:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.31.12r4; KDE/4.4.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100212195529.GD1560@muc.de> <20100214113212.63fcd6a8@digimed.co.uk> <201002201208.09675.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201002201208.09675.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002201320.28050.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 3d07f069-e957-41b1-83b8-129af9c35bd8 X-Archives-Hash: a7ed07efe3d95c2bc0b74a0527958e7c On Samstag 20 Februar 2010, Mick wrote: > On Sunday 14 February 2010 11:32:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial > > > > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the > > > > majority, won't be flaged at all. > > > > > > so does cfg-update.... > > > > Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - and I > > give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and always go back > > to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with it, I just prefer (or > > am used to) conf-update. > > > > I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I would > > welcome it with open arms though. > > You make me feel out of touch with Gentoo! Is dispatch-conf and etc-update > that bad then? Not bad - not good enough.