From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-107589-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NgvB0-0003zm-N7
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:15:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B9FAE0843;
	Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (mail-ew0-f216.google.com [209.85.219.216])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFF8E0843
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so5213742ewy.29
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:15:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=46HRzNWebYGdVFqOTp8aOFgauM46mer1gzMlvJSkigU=;
        b=uURawC0dNgv89trCxbo3ahEx+icPIKBBT1LA1DarDEOr6QPz8nqQhNxJspQbN3/CCc
         GFe89NFwPrp37ECrIfqcKa9a2EXF4zxFdKYAB1bwl+ZwSHwAgpFwXZyCHcb4Q5+gMVRR
         pTu3OLIHUVVVKA1QxfRvVSnaSuA7/xP7v1B1w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=h3z6xzLwhoyqKZXvWdllbNwaoRXzWxJd4g9UrLxlwQDfEuoaxGeiV+xfo7r7zysKsC
         QRAkE1hoOC4sKZDCcH6YxTt12RWHXHCXnsk58fPy+AU/LNJAxwR70P2v/TBxTkbFn/sK
         uaFVfRR+TXARmBs+0VamDCa+THcs9tFPlwiRQ=
Received: by 10.213.109.129 with SMTP id j1mr3391261ebp.79.1266218112594;
        Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:15:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm4252501ewy.2.2010.02.14.23.15.11
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:15:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] poppler vs virtual/poppler & eix-test-obsolete
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:12:58 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6; KDE/4.4.0; x86_64; ; )
References: <5bdc1c8b1002141210o3692f899w46910a2e4fff8d57@mail.gmail.com> <13652B08-A327-4CEE-BE30-6174AFCE4389@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <5bdc1c8b1002141404s3be04380o5bd96443c124134@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b1002141404s3be04380o5bd96443c124134@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201002150912.59071.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 358ee6d1-e41b-4329-8359-99dfd8354769
X-Archives-Hash: 6095158e6f2bddce3c2e07cd15cbe758

On Monday 15 February 2010 00:04:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Stroller
> 
> <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 14 Feb 2010, at 20:31, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> ...
> >>  poppler isn't in my world file:
> >> ...
> >>  Are you suggesting the I unmerge poppler and then do a
> >> revdep-rebuild (or emerge -DuN @world) to get it reinstalled without
> >> this problem?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > Stroller.
> 
> Well, it's an interesting result, or I'm just getting tired.
> 
> I really think that I tried emerge --depclean earlier and it didn't
> fix the problem. After emerge -C poppler/emerge poppler I was left
> with the same failure in eix-test-obsolete but this time emerge
> --depclean did get rid of the 4 virtuals.
> 
> I don't know. I suspect now that I never did emerge --depclean.

Possibly. --depclean removed virtual/poppler here, leaving the real poppler 
package that was in place.

FWIW, tinkering with poppler won't break anything much. It's just a pdf 
rendering library, not critical. If you remove it in error, emerge -1 will put 
it back :-)

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com