From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngcia-0008G4-7L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:32:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15295E05C1; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7AFE05C1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 259114D75E1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:32:20 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:32:12 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How should I clean up my broken system? Message-ID: <20100214113212.63fcd6a8@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201002141203.40600.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> References: <20100212195529.GD1560@muc.de> <201002140801.51064.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20100214093409.7b27745c@digimed.co.uk> <201002141203.40600.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5cvs18 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/F1zH_Z__..ORoMhpS97FU_9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 7ed03351-2e87-4488-9e5e-22b9604fbc6c X-Archives-Hash: 58ee9006265e2dfaad4ffe7e66bc877c --Sig_/F1zH_Z__..ORoMhpS97FU_9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial > > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the > > majority, won't be flaged at all. =20 >=20 > so does cfg-update.... Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - and I give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and always go back to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with it, I just prefer (or am used to) conf-update. I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I would welcome it with open arms though. --=20 Neil Bothwick The modem is the message. --Sig_/F1zH_Z__..ORoMhpS97FU_9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkt330IACgkQum4al0N1GQMUdwCgvn1JxiDpxts2vJwEWov8AcfF k04An2b8AQuscVV9TVh9XZW4AHMSX1Z/ =4ZCM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/F1zH_Z__..ORoMhpS97FU_9--