From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:27:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002091627.32157.joost@antarean.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <702F5366-D38F-4B0C-BD52-1250CBFAC6CB@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 16:11:14 Stroller wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > ...
> > With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
> > array in a
> > reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
> > and then re-
> > add the disk to the array.
>
> Exactly. Except the partitions extend, in the same positions, across
> all the disks.
>
> You cannot remove one disk from the array and repartition it, because
> the partition is across the array, not the disk. The single disk,
> removed from a RAID 5 (specified by Paul Hartman) array does not
> contain any partitions, just one stripe of them.
>
> I apologise if I'm misunderstanding something here, or if your RAID
> works differently to mine.
>
> Stroller.
>
Stroller, it is my understanding that you use hardware raid adapters?
If that is the case, then the mentioned method won't work for you and if your
raid-adapters already align everything properly, then you shouldn't notice any
problems with these drives.
It would, however, be interesting to know how hardware raid adapters handle
these 4KB sector-sizes.
I believe Paul Hartman is, like me, using Linux Sofware raid (mdadm+kernel
drivers).
In that case, you can do either of the following:
Put the whole disk into the RAID, eg:
mdadm --create --level=5 --devices=6 /dev/sd[abcdef]
Or, you create 1 or more partitions on the disk and use these, eg:
mdadm --create --level=5 --devices=6 /dev/sd[abcdef]1
To have linux auto-detect for raid devices work, as far as I know, the
partitioning method is required.
For that, I created a single full-disk partition on my drives:
--
# fdisk -l -u /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xda7d8d6d
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 64 2930277167 1465138552 fd Linux raid autodetect
--
I, after reading this, redid the array with the partition starting at sector
64. Paul was unfortunate to have already filled his disks before this thread
appeared.
The downside is: you loose one sector, but the advantage is a much improved
performance (Or more precisely, not incur the performance penalty from having
misaligned partitions)
--
Joost Roeleveld
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 16:27 [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 17:30 ` Alexander
2010-02-07 18:19 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-07 19:26 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 18:38 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 19:16 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-07 19:39 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-07 20:31 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 21:59 ` Kyle Bader
2010-02-07 21:42 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-08 2:08 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-08 17:10 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-08 18:52 ` Valmor de Almeida
2010-02-08 20:34 ` Paul Hartman
2010-02-09 0:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 12:46 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 13:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 23:37 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 6:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-10 7:11 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 8:37 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-10 8:43 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-09 13:35 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-09 13:57 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 15:11 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 15:27 ` J. Roeleveld [this message]
2010-02-09 17:38 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 18:25 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 19:29 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 15:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 17:17 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 20:30 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 18:03 ` Neil Walker
2010-02-09 19:37 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 23:52 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 1:16 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 6:59 ` Neil Walker
2010-02-10 7:31 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 1:28 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 11:14 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 16:37 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 17:26 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 20:48 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 0:11 ` Peter Humphrey
2010-02-10 6:48 ` Neil Walker
2010-02-09 17:33 ` Paul Hartman
2010-02-09 7:47 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 23:22 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 7:08 ` Alan McKinnon
2010-02-10 10:56 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 10:53 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 11:03 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-10 11:17 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 11:24 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-08 5:25 ` Valmor de Almeida
2010-02-08 19:57 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 0:05 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 0:37 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 2:48 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 17:09 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 18:21 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 21:13 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 22:17 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 22:54 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-10 0:31 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 1:27 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-10 7:06 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-09 16:31 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-12 9:06 ` Mick
2010-02-12 12:14 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 0:47 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 2:20 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-15 0:48 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-15 1:17 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-15 3:17 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-15 18:03 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-15 23:53 ` Alex Schuster
2010-02-16 17:35 ` Frank Steinmetzger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002091627.32157.joost@antarean.org \
--to=joost@antarean.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox