From: Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 01:05:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002090105.13960.Warp_7@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b1002071342v6c81cf13gde7bcef72be5017b@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1350 bytes --]
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> Hi Willie,
> OK - it turns out if I start fdisk using the -u option it show me
> sector numbers. Looking at the original partition put on just using
> default values it had the starting sector was 63
Same here.
> - probably about the worst value it could be.
Hm.... what about those first 62 sectors?
I bought this 500GB drive for my laptop recently and did a fresh partitioning
scheme on it, and then rsynced the filesystems of the old, smaller drive onto
it. The first two partitions are ntfs, but I believe they also use cluster
sizes of 4k by default. So technically I could repartition everything and
then restore the contents from my backup drive.
And indeed my system becomes very sluggish when I do some HDD shuffling.
> As a test I blew away that partition and
> created a new one starting at 64 instead and the untar results are
> vastly improved - down to roughly 20 seconds from 8-10 minutes. That's
> roughly twice as fast as the old 120GB SATA2 drive I was using to test
> the system out while I debugged this issue.
Though the result justifies your decision, I would have though one has to
start at 65, unless the disk starts counting its sectors at 0.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
Programmers don’t die, they GOSUB without RETURN.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 16:27 [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 17:30 ` Alexander
2010-02-07 18:19 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-07 19:26 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 18:38 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 19:16 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-07 19:39 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-07 20:31 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-07 21:59 ` Kyle Bader
2010-02-07 21:42 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-08 2:08 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-08 17:10 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-08 18:52 ` Valmor de Almeida
2010-02-08 20:34 ` Paul Hartman
2010-02-09 0:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 12:46 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 13:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 23:37 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 6:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-10 7:11 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 8:37 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-10 8:43 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-09 13:35 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-09 13:57 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 15:11 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 15:27 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 17:38 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 18:25 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 19:29 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 15:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 17:17 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 20:30 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-09 18:03 ` Neil Walker
2010-02-09 19:37 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 23:52 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 1:16 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 6:59 ` Neil Walker
2010-02-10 7:31 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 1:28 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 11:14 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 16:37 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 17:26 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 20:48 ` Stroller
2010-02-10 0:11 ` Peter Humphrey
2010-02-10 6:48 ` Neil Walker
2010-02-09 17:33 ` Paul Hartman
2010-02-09 7:47 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 23:22 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 7:08 ` Alan McKinnon
2010-02-10 10:56 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 10:53 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 11:03 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-10 11:17 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-10 11:24 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-08 5:25 ` Valmor de Almeida
2010-02-08 19:57 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 0:05 ` Frank Steinmetzger [this message]
2010-02-09 0:37 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 2:48 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 17:09 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 18:21 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 21:13 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-09 22:17 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-02-09 22:54 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-10 0:31 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-10 1:27 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-10 7:06 ` Iain Buchanan
2010-02-09 16:31 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-12 9:06 ` Mick
2010-02-12 12:14 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 0:47 ` Stroller
2010-02-09 2:20 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-15 0:48 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-15 1:17 ` Willie Wong
2010-02-15 3:17 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-15 18:03 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2010-02-15 23:53 ` Alex Schuster
2010-02-16 17:35 ` Frank Steinmetzger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002090105.13960.Warp_7@gmx.de \
--to=warp_7@gmx.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox