From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeCRT-0007VO-9c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:05:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64E17E0A9B for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f214.google.com (mail-fx0-f214.google.com [209.85.220.214]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505BFE096A for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1847580fxm.38 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:19:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=WmDGNg9ug2w+lawlX5BX2iRRuAAF30JSmWwe1etp7WI=; b=wI7qFLR+qm1+VPXQHtdXf/23uz4zKqz38oq0eZWcd1tK/I3eafJDcZAal9eua/J1ow 0R+g1qbF4KC9F2NfTCPyf7rH5dh9cv2QVz6Mp0SLgoAlpZYvR7w3O0OnzrGa+95VztGS MjbJrTQly0QHzfmN1q7aArFQYkLday6woKi9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=M5/+H4SoXN0SLV6QNJZjX3clELR9g9hN3GCWk50Dsy891x7OoP9bKrI0upM8jnvIDd deTEkkE+beNhzTKrATWF7RlP8eF8Llnu17uHDKYd6n+0X0ePEk3PzCPTXJvc7E2KOZFw ZkAS14kBvCoRak29sTFwv9xBCjJgYIaMnzRZw= Received: by 10.102.211.9 with SMTP id j9mr3674890mug.130.1265566785711; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from energy.localnet (ip-80-226-1-7.vodafone-net.de [80.226.1.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g1sm17223273muf.7.2010.02.07.10.19.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:19:44 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:19:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.31.12r4; KDE/4.3.95; x86_64; ; ) References: <5bdc1c8b1002070827i14f59047k39a695900ebe9889@mail.gmail.com> <201002072030.43425.b3nder@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <201002072030.43425.b3nder@yandex.ru> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002071919.38799.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9ae9c502-f00d-4dea-9da0-1bcfe57cb0db X-Archives-Hash: e956994c15a734096b6fb3c89b1a4e6e On Sonntag 07 Februar 2010, Alexander wrote: > On Sunday 07 February 2010 19:27:46 Mark Knecht wrote: > > Every time there is an apparent delay I just see the hard drive > > > > light turned on solid. That said as far as I know if I wait for things > > to complete the data is there but I haven't tested it extensively. > > > > Is this a bad drive or am I somehow using it incorrectly? > > Is there any related info in dmesg? or maybe there is too much cached and seeking is not the drives strong point ...