From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcyUC-0002wO-EA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:58:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 597DFE09F9; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailin.taunusstein.net (mailin.taunusstein.net [193.138.96.2]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A4BE09F9 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailin.taunusstein.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA40479CF for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:57:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=taunusstein.net; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:from:date:received :received:received:x-virus-scanned; s=tsst2008; t=1265277474; x= 1267091874; bh=Ja/qEsjEVx5aW57g5bxpvTzPcx6n++YDhbVIszERT30=; b=w jKGnrVnrLfIoUSNq9uRxmx8PY3o5AOhOf0ca4+BZuxpNw8CT4TlnBfa74e0j9SXK psMj8t43gGRqgJ4XFKaT16euj3m3ozbXKmJ+muVzriCpEuuVwS5f9dEboS5bdt6K J7z4yycZAlU4QBEF1aJNHJn7awWu1m4Zl/lyBZ5UAM= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at taunusstein.net Received: from mailin.taunusstein.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.taunusstein.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TsMuVU3ZlT4R for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:57:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from nebukadnezar (p5087DE86.dip.t-dialin.net [80.135.222.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: stefan.schulte@taunusstein.net) by mailin.taunusstein.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:57:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by nebukadnezar (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) stefan.schulte@taunusstein.net; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:57:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:57:58 +0100 From: Stefan Schulte To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] binutils broken revdep-rebuild Message-ID: <20100204095758.GA2153@nebukadnezar.matrix.de> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20100204071536.GB29533@tuxradar.vf.shawcable.net> <4B6A8C42.8060506@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6A8C42.8060506@gmail.com> Jabber-ID: stefan.schulte@swissjabber.ch User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 6d122801-382b-426b-9f1b-d712f999c3e5 X-Archives-Hash: 70d2a834eee5f666f27bcfb7d0e2d85d --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Mariusz Ceier wrote: > W dniu 04.02.2010 08:15, Steven pisze: > > I am having a recurring error for the last few weeks > >=20 > > revdep-rebuild -p > >=20 > > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > >=20 > > * Checking reverse dependencies > > * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package > > * update > > * will be emerged. > >=20 > > * Collecting system binaries and libraries > > * Generated new 1_files.rr > > * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr > > * Checking dynamic linking consistency > > [ 37% ] * broken > > /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la (requires > > -liberty) > > * broken > > * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libopcodes.la > > * (requires -liberty) > > [ 100% ] =20 > > * Generated new 3_broken.rr > > * Assigning files to packages > > * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la > > * -> sys-devel/binutils > > * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libopcodes.la > > * -> sys-devel/binutils > > * Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr > > * Cleaning list of packages to rebuild > > * Generated new 4_pkgs.rr > > * Assigning packages to ebuilds > > * Generated new 4_ebuilds.rr > > * Evaluating package order > > * Generated new 5_order.rr > > * All prepared. Starting rebuild > >=20 > > emerge --oneshot --pretend sys-devel/binutils:0 > >=20 > > I am not to sure how to go about trouble shooting this problem. > > Everything seems to be running as usual aside from the revdep-rebuild > > broken error. > Check if you have /etc/ld.so.conf.d/05binutils and not > /etc/env.d/00glibc ( this file should contain LDPATH=3D"include > ld.so.conf.d/*.conf" ), if so - rebuild glibc. If this is not the case, > maybe try lafilefixer --justfixit. >=20 > HTH >=20 I have the same problem and I think the problem is revdep-rebuild. binutils is just working fine and revdep-rebuild just thinks that it is broken, because it doesnt check the right librarypath (/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib). I tried your suggestion (rebuild glibc) and it doesnt work. But I noticed something interesting: cat /etc/ld.so.conf.d/05binutils.conf=20 /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib cat /etc/ld.so.conf /usr/local/lib include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf [...] I think this is normal. But when I start revdep-rebuild -v I get revdep-rebuild environment: SEARCH_DIRS=3D"/bin include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf /lib /lib64 /opt/bin [...] So I guess the include-Statement should load the files under ld.so.conf.d but it looks like its interpreted as a normal path -Stefan --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAktqmiYACgkQb/0p3fxiox5cqQCgksJQyXLYiJ5vIbkhuQEbBvId PiUAn2FqCYGvGkmF129gdUz9d0lyRGQb =XycZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--