From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NURT7-0007HM-Ne for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:06:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E4CFE086C; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741BE086C for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE1AC4BC58F for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:05:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:05:51 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Rebuilding an NTFS directory structure Message-ID: <20100111210551.5cfbd32b@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201001111515.37481.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> References: <201001091148.35575.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <201001111151.20714.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20100111132730.1755b474@digimed.co.uk> <201001111515.37481.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4cvs1 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/a50fBmWwZ6l+Yh6_MSd1cGV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 510dbca2-0623-4680-9fd3-a84561acd560 X-Archives-Hash: 51128138b3be2e7992a6f9591569fa6c --Sig_/a50fBmWwZ6l+Yh6_MSd1cGV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:15:37 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: > So it is. Looks like 11:51 is still too early in the morning. If it's morning, it's too early :) --=20 Neil Bothwick WYTYSYDG - What you thought you saw, you didn't get. --Sig_/a50fBmWwZ6l+Yh6_MSd1cGV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktLkrQACgkQum4al0N1GQP3ZACcCxt+qdX0jME4H65CN4KH5uDB JroAn3yuk9R9sLop5FaDq9bPf2HX2K+I =mlzu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/a50fBmWwZ6l+Yh6_MSd1cGV--