From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQ7Zf-0008W9-0v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:03:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19128E0818; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C810DE0818 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so14575352ewy.26 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:02:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=QQt4AYmLb0c6+sSLfL5aNM8GVxjnKRTOb2be4Yh7jcE=; b=emhB2/kabYGF9PRkwsmj1AyeVNut1C4vgLHurrydeHSakCVoIrldD54qFE61SeFLHJ JhUXWZG8JlvQXmOvvFTNI/KJjhpsRAU6rI8ryKdH7FXCGsXwGtgH7hfPgJbWymjqjhKg zZOEFEPO2EZS0X8+tAFZO+wREKoHwvEM3ShNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=lCHNO/Ub8/q4FvGRqw2/P9uzphQeJNB3KCL0DAGm7qyxsPVBYSLwOMQUT+J4ZXaZB2 wj+dbKgruxeLbi8RyL810v4IM/qx78Uerngya0aXBAg0L4WDFrpT5O8/BbczwKnbbayw Y0LKLT8r7Zl6ficBMXX6JSOmar7Sdac3zDSoU= Received: by 10.213.99.212 with SMTP id v20mr866944ebn.7.1262214158961; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-222-47.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.222.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm9844960ewy.15.2009.12.30.15.02.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:02:38 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse??? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:01:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-zen9; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <5bdc1c8b0912291753p46880ce8ta8e4d7e29561ab1f@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0912300610p62a650a2vbe4c469903538a8a@mail.gmail.com> <4B3BD6D8.4090608@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B3BD6D8.4090608@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912310101.02526.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 6232a3af-ee58-40b8-ab41-c548fee9714e X-Archives-Hash: 8550a0eed09b4a80df0ea20c8e3801a1 On Thursday 31 December 2009 00:40:24 Dale wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote: > >>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>>>> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to > >>>>> the eix database. > >>>> > >>>> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without > >>>> installing the overlay first > >>>> > >>>> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays > >>> > >>> As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will! > >>> > >>> eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of > >>> the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants. > >>> > >>> I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet > >>> eix found the ebuild for me. > >> > >> well well whaddaya know > >> > >> it works ! > > > > Humm...so if I would have simply done exactly what Neil suggested I > > would have seen it without actually installing the overlay? Cool. > > > > - Mark > > Is this documented anywhere? I would like to see how this works, > without doing it just in case I mess up. lol > > Dale You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working (almost everyone here has that): eix-remote -q update eix tada!! -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com