From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPyCH-0006AL-UV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:02:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05900E07F7; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (mail-ew0-f214.google.com [209.85.219.214]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F34DE07F7 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so10450182ewy.29 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:02:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=mioLMApLq9aM5zjV5CELrK+DiS0Vj6mijbuqM067+Do=; b=DW+xMH+yn7w6Ua5BFHgjriVgZdvw9rak0a3dBAcfb37SjYlbmlTk8mFV4yN/sTvgw5 LExeNmCYVFbGrS3Xp2usWRr8/TmeqrPRixNG9il8lr5QMBrQigBB5oZgJMEA3zJffnhw QPxw23UAs7WES0gGGdhJ19i/DFk7aCmr/pqFM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=DJXGjGpzV+YAcL5Qe1nP3Hn/NgS/vyyVarpxNbbrg4/RFMtuidfTii6xfzODsGBiWc fDqtO3vg37nSa1tBE5lCR785/30wnLk5zhMwMpofaAtcJIWSDsYy3XLN/pD1KEPxZpx0 A8rBcPrpoXOXYrg9hbQknalT+NJiJ0T2hsUUY= Received: by 10.213.100.156 with SMTP id y28mr2258063ebn.68.1262178145891; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:02:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-222-47.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.222.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm9520705ewy.0.2009.12.30.05.02.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:02:25 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse??? Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:00:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-zen9; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <5bdc1c8b0912291753p46880ce8ta8e4d7e29561ab1f@mail.gmail.com> <200912301244.52527.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20091230122101.45705230@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091230122101.45705230@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912301500.46686.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: e85ff457-a287-4b4e-9398-07b3b45846dd X-Archives-Hash: 7cd4e99569b53ebe32810e908a622221 On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to > > > the eix database. > > > > I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without > > installing the overlay first > > > > eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays > > As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will! > > eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of > the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants. > > I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet > eix found the ebuild for me. > well well whaddaya know it works ! -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com