* [gentoo-user] subclipse???
@ 2009-12-30 1:53 Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 10:27 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2009-12-30 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
What are the commands to find out if subclipse is supported through an overlay?
http://subclipse.tigris.org/
Thanks,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 1:53 [gentoo-user] subclipse??? Mark Knecht
@ 2009-12-30 10:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-30 10:44 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2009-12-30 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 617 bytes --]
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:53:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> What are the commands to find out if subclipse is supported through an
> overlay?
[root@zaphod ~ 0]% eix subclipse
* dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1]
Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s
Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary)
[1] "digital-trauma.de" layman/trauma
You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to the
eix database.
--
Neil Bothwick
Try to be the best of whatever you are, even if what you are is no good.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 10:27 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2009-12-30 10:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-30 12:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-30 13:58 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-12-30 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:53:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > What are the commands to find out if subclipse is supported through an
> > overlay?
>
> [root@zaphod ~ 0]% eix subclipse
> * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1]
> Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s
> Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
> Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary)
>
> [1] "digital-trauma.de" layman/trauma
>
> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to the
> eix database.
>
I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without installing
the overlay first
eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 10:44 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2009-12-30 12:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-30 13:00 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-30 13:58 ` Mark Knecht
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2009-12-30 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to
> > the eix database.
> >
>
> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
> installing the overlay first
>
> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will!
eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of
the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants.
I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet
eix found the ebuild for me.
--
Neil Bothwick
I wouldn't be caught dead with a necrophiliac.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 12:21 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2009-12-30 13:00 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-30 14:10 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-12-30 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to
> > > the eix database.
> >
> > I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
> > installing the overlay first
> >
> > eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
>
> As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will!
>
> eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of
> the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants.
>
> I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet
> eix found the ebuild for me.
>
well well whaddaya know
it works !
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 10:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-30 12:21 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2009-12-30 13:58 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 14:17 ` Zeerak Waseem
2009-12-30 14:45 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2009-12-30 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:53:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> > What are the commands to find out if subclipse is supported through an
>> > overlay?
>>
>> [root@zaphod ~ 0]% eix subclipse
>> * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1]
>> Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s
>> Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
>> Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary)
>>
>> [1] "digital-trauma.de" layman/trauma
>>
>> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to the
>> eix database.
>>
>
> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without installing
> the overlay first
>
> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
Yes, thanks Alan. That is what I was asking. I guess I should have
posted that eix subsclipse showed nothing on my machines:
dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse
No matches found.
dragonfly ~ #
After adding the trauma overlay with layman now I see it:
dragonfly ~ # layman -l
* trauma [Subversion]
(http://svn.digital-trauma.de/gentoo/trunk/ )
dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse
* dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1]
Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s
Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary)
[1] "digital-trauma.de" /usr/local/portage/layman/trauma
dragonfly ~ #
but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place?
This came up the other day where Grant was asking about rt-sources and
I was able to answer because I use it and knew which overlay to tell
him to add, but then I hit the wall myself and didn't know how to
figure this out short of adding all overlays which seemed silly.
I had hoped that layman would have a way to search non-installed
overlays but I didn't find that so I asked here.
And thanks to Neil who at least told me what overlay had a binary
version. Unfortunately it appears it an older version of subclipse
that's not intended for use with eclipse-3.5.
Thanks,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 13:00 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2009-12-30 14:10 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 22:40 ` Dale
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2009-12-30 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > > You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to
>> > > the eix database.
>> >
>> > I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
>> > installing the overlay first
>> >
>> > eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
>>
>> As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will!
>>
>> eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of
>> the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants.
>>
>> I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet
>> eix found the ebuild for me.
>>
>
> well well whaddaya know
>
> it works !
>
Humm...so if I would have simply done exactly what Neil suggested I
would have seen it without actually installing the overlay? Cool.
- Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 13:58 ` Mark Knecht
@ 2009-12-30 14:17 ` Zeerak Waseem
2009-12-30 14:45 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Zeerak Waseem @ 2009-12-30 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
The eix-remote -q update command should take care of that. Try running it
and searching for something that you know isn't in one of the overlays
that you use :-)
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:58:44 +0100, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
>> installing
>> the overlay first
>>
>> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
>
> Yes, thanks Alan. That is what I was asking. I guess I should have
> posted that eix subsclipse showed nothing on my machines:
>
> dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse
> No matches found.
> dragonfly ~ #
>
> After adding the trauma overlay with layman now I see it:
>
> dragonfly ~ # layman -l
> * trauma [Subversion]
> (http://svn.digital-trauma.de/gentoo/trunk/ )
> dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse
> * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1]
> Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s
> Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
> Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary)
>
> [1] "digital-trauma.de" /usr/local/portage/layman/trauma
> dragonfly ~ #
>
> but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place?
>
> This came up the other day where Grant was asking about rt-sources and
> I was able to answer because I use it and knew which overlay to tell
> him to add, but then I hit the wall myself and didn't know how to
> figure this out short of adding all overlays which seemed silly.
>
> I had hoped that layman would have a way to search non-installed
> overlays but I didn't find that so I asked here.
>
> And thanks to Neil who at least told me what overlay had a binary
> version. Unfortunately it appears it an older version of subclipse
> that's not intended for use with eclipse-3.5.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 13:58 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 14:17 ` Zeerak Waseem
@ 2009-12-30 14:45 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2009-12-30 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 272 bytes --]
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:58:44 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place?
As I said in the first post, use eix-remote before eix.
--
Neil Bothwick
Member, National Association For Tagline Assimilators (NAFTA)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 14:10 ` Mark Knecht
@ 2009-12-30 22:40 ` Dale
2009-12-30 23:01 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2009-12-30 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to
>>>>> the eix database.
>>>>>
>>>> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
>>>> installing the overlay first
>>>>
>>>> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
>>>>
>>> As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will!
>>>
>>> eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of
>>> the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants.
>>>
>>> I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet
>>> eix found the ebuild for me.
>>>
>>>
>> well well whaddaya know
>>
>> it works !
>>
>>
>
> Humm...so if I would have simply done exactly what Neil suggested I
> would have seen it without actually installing the overlay? Cool.
>
> - Mark
>
>
Is this documented anywhere? I would like to see how this works,
without doing it just in case I mess up. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 22:40 ` Dale
@ 2009-12-30 23:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-31 0:17 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-31 1:00 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-12-30 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thursday 31 December 2009 00:40:24 Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>>>> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to
> >>>>> the eix database.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
> >>>> installing the overlay first
> >>>>
> >>>> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
> >>>
> >>> As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will!
> >>>
> >>> eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of
> >>> the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants.
> >>>
> >>> I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet
> >>> eix found the ebuild for me.
> >>
> >> well well whaddaya know
> >>
> >> it works !
> >
> > Humm...so if I would have simply done exactly what Neil suggested I
> > would have seen it without actually installing the overlay? Cool.
> >
> > - Mark
>
> Is this documented anywhere? I would like to see how this works,
> without doing it just in case I mess up. lol
>
> Dale
You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working (almost everyone here
has that):
eix-remote -q update
eix <something>
tada!!
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 23:01 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2009-12-31 0:17 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-31 2:17 ` Dale
2009-12-31 1:00 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2009-12-31 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 December 2009 00:40:24 Dale wrote:
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 14:21:01 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> >>>>> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to
>> >>>>> the eix database.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
>> >>>> installing the overlay first
>> >>>>
>> >>>> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
>> >>>
>> >>> As it's panto season now - Oh Yes It Will!
>> >>>
>> >>> eix-update reads installed overlays but eix-remote downloads a list of
>> >>> the contents of all layman overlays, giving exactly what Mark wants.
>> >>>
>> >>> I hadn't even heard of the trauma overlay, let alone installed it, yet
>> >>> eix found the ebuild for me.
>> >>
>> >> well well whaddaya know
>> >>
>> >> it works !
>> >
>> > Humm...so if I would have simply done exactly what Neil suggested I
>> > would have seen it without actually installing the overlay? Cool.
>> >
>> > - Mark
>>
>> Is this documented anywhere? I would like to see how this works,
>> without doing it just in case I mess up. lol
>>
>> Dale
>
>
> You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working (almost everyone here
> has that):
>
> eix-remote -q update
>
> eix <something>
>
> tada!!
I was like Dale which is why I didn't try it when Neil suggested it
this morning. eix-remote --help says it downloads eix-caches which to
someone who doesn't program this stuff sounded like something I
couldn't fix myself.
- Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-30 23:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-31 0:17 ` Mark Knecht
@ 2009-12-31 1:00 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-31 1:08 ` Dale
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2009-12-31 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 484 bytes --]
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:01:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Is this documented anywhere? I would like to see how this works,
> > without doing it just in case I mess up. lol
Try the eix man page. I know it's almost as hard to read as the mplayer
man page, but the information is there.
> You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working
Now there's a challenge for you Dale :)
--
Neil Bothwick
... Veni, Vidi, Visa - I came, I saw, I charged it.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-31 1:00 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2009-12-31 1:08 ` Dale
2009-12-31 10:08 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2009-12-31 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:01:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>
>>> Is this documented anywhere? I would like to see how this works,
>>> without doing it just in case I mess up. lol
>>>
>
> Try the eix man page. I know it's almost as hard to read as the mplayer
> man page, but the information is there.
>
>
>> You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working
>>
>
> Now there's a challenge for you Dale :)
>
>
I was about to reply to Alans and say the same thing. Are you guys SURE
I can't screw this up? o_O I'm good at this you know. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-31 0:17 ` Mark Knecht
@ 2009-12-31 2:17 ` Dale
2009-12-31 7:43 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2009-12-31 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working (almost everyone here
>> has that):
>>
>> eix-remote -q update
>>
>> eix <something>
>>
>> tada!!
>>
>
> I was like Dale which is why I didn't try it when Neil suggested it
> this morning. eix-remote --help says it downloads eix-caches which to
> someone who doesn't program this stuff sounded like something I
> couldn't fix myself.
>
> - Mark
>
>
I still got my feathers on. Uh, I'm chicken. How would one undo this?
As in, delete the stuff when it is not needed anymore.
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-31 2:17 ` Dale
@ 2009-12-31 7:43 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-12-31 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thursday 31 December 2009 04:17:10 Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> You can't cock it up. If you have eix and layman working (almost
> >> everyone here has that):
> >>
> >> eix-remote -q update
> >>
> >> eix <something>
> >>
> >> tada!!
> >
> > I was like Dale which is why I didn't try it when Neil suggested it
> > this morning. eix-remote --help says it downloads eix-caches which to
> > someone who doesn't program this stuff sounded like something I
> > couldn't fix myself.
> >
> > - Mark
>
> I still got my feathers on. Uh, I'm chicken. How would one undo this?
> As in, delete the stuff when it is not needed anymore.
eix-remote -h
man eix and search for eix-remote
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???
2009-12-31 1:08 ` Dale
@ 2009-12-31 10:08 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2009-12-31 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 296 bytes --]
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:08:05 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Now there's a challenge for you Dale :)
> I was about to reply to Alans and say the same thing. Are you guys
> SURE I can't screw this up? o_O
Alan is, I'm not :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Grow your own dope, plant a politician!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-31 10:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-30 1:53 [gentoo-user] subclipse??? Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 10:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-30 10:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-30 12:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-30 13:00 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-30 14:10 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 22:40 ` Dale
2009-12-30 23:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-31 0:17 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-31 2:17 ` Dale
2009-12-31 7:43 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-31 1:00 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-31 1:08 ` Dale
2009-12-31 10:08 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-30 13:58 ` Mark Knecht
2009-12-30 14:17 ` Zeerak Waseem
2009-12-30 14:45 ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox