From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLOcu-0004ay-LO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:15:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 419B7E1193; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6758E1193 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46FE03510A7 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:15:37 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils Message-ID: <20091217221537.555ed915@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4B2A9EB3.30501@gmail.com> References: <4B2A545A.9090802@gmail.com> <4B2A7FA4.2040001@gentoo.org> <4B2A9EB3.30501@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3cvs39 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/3Eek.hTwPg97z7x18CzMurm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a20bf6ea-bf1c-42ac-b413-e5306663cb52 X-Archives-Hash: 943facf00bb5f24eb86c110eca3e360c --Sig_/3Eek.hTwPg97z7x18CzMurm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:12:19 -0600, Dale wrote: > You are both right. I tried installing a later version on the blockers=20 > but not the packages that depended on them. So, I added the following=20 > to my package.keyword and package.unmask files: >=20 > =3Dapp-portage/eix-0.18.3 > =3Dapp-arch/libarchive-2.7.1 >=20 > Portage is now happy. Every time I think I have figured out portage > and these blocker messages, I get thrown a curve ball. lol=20 Ah, the fun of running a mixed arch/~arch system :) BTW ~ is usually better than =3D in this situation. --=20 Neil Bothwick As of next week, passwords will be entered in Morse code. --Sig_/3Eek.hTwPg97z7x18CzMurm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksqrYkACgkQum4al0N1GQP1SACdF4lKkNa9RSu9mBOS5oBUfbZo mFIAniIf+Tx8Ki3KTm3QtNHHE2ojlkyr =/+aU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3Eek.hTwPg97z7x18CzMurm--