From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDN2-00012U-0e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:02:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 134C0E09BA for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentinel.math.Princeton.EDU (sentinel.math.Princeton.EDU [128.112.16.31]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55978E0805 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from math.princeton.edu ([128.112.18.16] helo=sep.dynalias.net) by sentinel.math.Princeton.EDU with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKC5g-000069-4k for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:40:01 -0500 Received: by sep.dynalias.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 60D6964B02B; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:43:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:43:44 -0500 From: Willie Wong To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: extract an image from a .doc file? Message-ID: <20091214144344.GA21815@princeton.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <19C9F1BB-65F4-4D4C-8506-160A471F1625@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <4B2501AD.7000008@darkmetatron.de> <155E655C-2B23-4BF3-ACD9-F186A5C3D965@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20091214140150.1d291e31@gmx.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091214140150.1d291e31@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 22332d18-2ca4-42f7-a8e4-075cc493ac39 X-Archives-Hash: 1aacf6ed1ec7216d02f1f79ca1727e2a On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:01:50PM +0100, Penguin Lover Renat Golubchyk squawked: > > It is a 2meg file, but unfortunately, as Mick appears to have > > predicted, it is called simply "Object 1" with no file extension. > > > > Running `file` on it shows it to be a "Microsoft Office Document", > > but it's apparently not the kind you can open in Word. > > Have you tried opening this "Object 1" file in OpenOffice and repeat > the steps above again? It would be hilarious if it were "Object N" all the way down. I apologize if these have been covered before, but since I don't remember seeing it: (a) Is it not possible to extract that image in Microsoft Word itself? (Opening the file in question in Microsoft Word and saving the image?) What happens if you save the file in Word's funny XML format? (Knowing MS, I wouldn't be too surprised if the image becomes some sort of funny base64 encoded string, but it is still worth a try.) (b) If the Big Wig is already happily letting the computer sign those documents for him, is it prohibitive to try the non-technological measure? E.g., ask the Big Wig to provide another image of his signature? (c) If the image file is that big, it is probably because the original that got included in the doc file has a ridiculously high resolution (maybe they just scanned the signature in, cleaned it up a bit? My signature usually fits in a 1/2 inch by 2 inch block, if scanned at 24-bit color and 600 dpi, this makes almost a 1M raw image). I hope if the processing/storage/bandwidth tax is high enough, an "upstream" fix would not be ruled out directly. Also, I do recall that newer versions of MS Word has the capability to compress included images; though it is not used by default. Cheers, W -- (04:01:59) W: yep (04:02:02) W: I love linux (04:02:15) NJYWT: I love penguins Sortir en Pantoufles: up 1102 days, 13:18