From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGyN0-0007hD-LK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:24:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE338E06BF; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBCCE06BF for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (grunthos.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B85816BE707 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:24:19 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:24:19 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: Your system might be broken and/or insecure due to serious patch-2.6 bug Message-ID: <20091205172419.41e660d9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4B1A69C7.3030608@gmail.com> References: <3ac129340912041502oac3e7d9o620a049b6141291@mail.gmail.com> <20091205051452.GB4840@ca.inter.net> <200912051431.16711.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <4B1A69C7.3030608@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3cvs30 (GTK+ 2.18.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/+Tm+sUvB6T1U4XV8mDEjPPn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d2f8a15e-5014-4a04-a49c-b3e7e04e7aac X-Archives-Hash: 3b9504c54bb7d1f38bf0d3badc6039d7 --Sig_/+Tm+sUvB6T1U4XV8mDEjPPn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:10:15 -0600, Dale wrote: > Good catch Volker. I didn't notice that part. He needs to become very=20 > familiar with the -1 option but even that is not good in every case. > If it is a package that needs to be in world, then that option > shouldn't be used either otherwise a --depclean would remove it.=20 He's updating, so packages that need to be in world are already there. --=20 Neil Bothwick I don't have any solution, but I certainly admire the problem. --Sig_/+Tm+sUvB6T1U4XV8mDEjPPn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksal0MACgkQum4al0N1GQPc9wCdGAqyxJEIeWQIXRwpd/dy49mU 7LUAoMRtr5DkkHQbdlpyCj9Dh1TR6PFk =WZ6T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+Tm+sUvB6T1U4XV8mDEjPPn--