From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAmCJ-0001DY-Fb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:11:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0B52E0819; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D410BE0819 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-79.storm.ca [216.106.102.79]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nAIFBBYL027496 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:11:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FF5A4C; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:11:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:11:05 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] configuring wlan0 Message-ID: <20091118151104.GP95848@kanga.digitaltorque.ca> References: <20091117232014.GA6951@anton.digitaltorque.ca> <200911180910.33949.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uX2tiToO0oGq+LKk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911180910.33949.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Archives-Salt: 75718aed-1adc-45d8-be1f-c6ee36429938 X-Archives-Hash: 2abec5541f0039f62542a0e1de7a7293 --uX2tiToO0oGq+LKk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/11/09 Alan McKinnon said: > Forget all about conf.d/net, and disable the init scripts for it. >=20 > Install and run wicd instead.=20 I'll look into it, but the Gentoo Handbook still points at conf.d/net, so should there not be an update if it has fallen out of favour? Should the bu= gs in conf.d/net not be fixed? Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --uX2tiToO0oGq+LKk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLBA6IKGqCc1vIvggRAmUTAKCp9or+9ky6Mm5XcRaQN+Xb3HkijQCfbIM0 NO45tZ0PLr3vwNq617eVeLM= =MtKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uX2tiToO0oGq+LKk--