public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @ world -> @preserved-rebuild ->   @preserved-rebuild -> what next?
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:13:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113231306.453f2f89@digimed.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0911131500m712e6889t8438da6bda10263f@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1279 bytes --]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:

> >
> > Was it an endless loop? AIUI you emerged twice and the
> > @preserved-rebuild count decreased. In my experience, it can
> > occasionally take a few runs to clear the list, sometimes subsequent
> > runs add packages that were not there previously, but it all clears
> > in the end, I have NEVER had to resort to deleting the registry file
> > manually.

> If I don't run it forever then I don't think I can say it would never
> clear up. Can't prove a negative, etc.

When you get identical package lists on subsequent runs, I think it's
fair to say it won't fix itself. This has never happened to me.

> However, it did get to the point where it was complaining about two
> packages and the number of files to be rebuilt went (IIRC) 52, 50, 50,
> so I decide since it was rebuilding 50 packages the 2nd & 3rd times it
> wasn't going to improve. Might not be true though.

I think it is being over-cautious, which results in packages being
rebuilt multiple time unnecessarily, but I's rather give it the chance to
fix itself. That said, I've never had a list anything like 50 packages
long, but I do update frequently.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Why are love and relationships so confusing?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-14  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-12 14:43 [gentoo-user] emerge @ world -> @preserved-rebuild -> @preserved-rebuild -> what next? Mark Knecht
2009-11-12 14:58 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-11-12 15:14   ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-12 16:19     ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-12 16:28       ` Alan McKinnon
2009-11-12 16:49         ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-13 12:39   ` Neil Bothwick
2009-11-13 18:42     ` Alan McKinnon
2009-11-13 19:46       ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-13 20:57         ` Alan McKinnon
2009-11-13 22:19           ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-13 22:38             ` Neil Bothwick
2009-11-13 23:00               ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-13 23:13                 ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2009-11-14  0:19                   ` Dale
2009-11-14  1:06                   ` Mark Knecht
2009-11-14  8:37                     ` Neil Bothwick
2009-11-14 19:51                     ` Alan McKinnon
2009-11-14 19:49                   ` Alan McKinnon
2009-11-16  8:58                     ` Erik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091113231306.453f2f89@digimed.co.uk \
    --to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox