From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N6jOm-0007YH-7l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:24:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10ED4E092C; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f212.google.com (mail-ew0-f212.google.com [209.85.219.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABCAE092C for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so436865ewy.15 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:24:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=t0HPJNoxpyyCfdOoDKzfAj7WJlUEWa80dxUROqEFRz4=; b=orbg9WyRbjNA0LTjKe1lELqWIumTYMORyL44atkEnyVLOOlTmz7GLg4Aj8fJLRmbWY 4xEJpPzOc5a35+F0nAUGlSWDl1X7bMYcVMA2P57bP+EYChaOJpol6+sXe8wIyP0L6evs Png+fDIv+IfV/E1LKQ9Jgq+AyFF6Ah+jJq5L0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Yl47mYCFEYk5g42cmbr3nEAx39ne1/FGHKhPuuEhYzTaEKMH1NE0YhbsgJyZfVWm2T vcQ6w7heSPDS727wN7YImth3Bln1hVk93x7d68gMQZFT1RaekcBn1rKLM7qqVw49vEt2 M1K+SzPqDWv+d0yxxkl3MDtDokbhrDkMzCbqo= Received: by 10.213.96.221 with SMTP id i29mr599165ebn.96.1257593042113; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:24:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lappy.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm999318eyx.13.2009.11.07.03.23.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:23:59 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unclaimed display? Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:23:45 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r8; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) References: <200909271329.40786.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20091104072902.GA12983@vidovic> In-Reply-To: <20091104072902.GA12983@vidovic> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1562892.CO2LdKGW6G"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911071123.57237.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 515e4caa-4bef-4407-98d2-c5ca336db5ab X-Archives-Hash: 52b91dd1bfdf350e182059f2ac0836d2 --nextPart1562892.CO2LdKGW6G Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 04 November 2009 07:29:03 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Mick wrote: > > I am looking at the lshw of a compaq desktop with pci-express and a > > Radeon X600 and see that it's VGA and secondary dispalyes are > > "unclaimed". What does this mean? >=20 > http://ezix.org/project/wiki/HardwareLiSter#Howtointerpretlshwsoutput >=20 > > Have I got the kernel config wrong? >=20 > Maybe. Or it comes from lshw. You could look at the lspci output to > compare. The lspci output does not show a driver either ... 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV380 0x3e50 [Radeo= n=20 X600] 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV380 [Radeon X600]=20 (Secondary) =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1562892.CO2LdKGW6G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkr1WM0ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYpSACdGl6jV6OQDViihJEkV9pJjoJR +RoAoPj1nsOo2Lc+GXE+dlVjikQ9KzfQ =AZse -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1562892.CO2LdKGW6G--