From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4VQv-00071J-99 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:05:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A52B3E0C4B; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54683E0C4B for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so485853ewy.14 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=XGuJVCLUNtcUuaIGlVxMFomotI5PtVWcKSGpRZMQXkw=; b=PqA2V/4GFGOqPr5jvDoKv044mmQaVT903NlGKtCl4+rFaWNRmBnzfxPg2+Ag1fO0MF JUZwmtu6T0UfGcpebEVJq2AJNPz5xCYz31ocZtKhRdArz63M+OicbO5sn/gfHC+bNgoc 37neKp86q2iLJk/g/JTpOoZa2NuIH6W8aX22I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=fk11712PVhTUSYIb9rtNDK4JLyEysYBhfrsuG8iKRo0nqsEJE/abiEfFPywaWWoOCr No2N1E3qW0fMzi5hKgOGWVUAlwq4jwsOcHjjtgWLYdRuHHdO8ail8hZeDVQTUl7Moqqk pBVHvPzbc7+zYlZ3Rn7l/OFjHgdiQR69pmKLs= Received: by 10.216.88.15 with SMTP id z15mr2764224wee.113.1257062702733; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.localnet ([91.132.49.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm4031169eyx.29.2009.11.01.01.05.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:05:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glxgears with no ... gears?! Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:01:51 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r8; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) References: <200910062105.14151.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200910100011.07063.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4AEC5C3A.9030307@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AEC5C3A.9030307@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14141173.5H9SzvGrPk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911010804.57953.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 06a6f3aa-daeb-4856-9ef1-741d31281ce2 X-Archives-Hash: c25224471602ff7eabb2bb1b9cff3f3e --nextPart14141173.5H9SzvGrPk Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 31 October 2009 15:48:10 Valmor de Almeida wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Am I the only one with dodgy glxgears? Any ideas at all? > > > > On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Mick wrote: > >> I've updated xorg following all relevant instructions by gentoo devs on > >> an old laptop and when I run glxgears I get no graphic and pedestrian > >> speeds: > >> > >> $ glxgears > >> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 125.622 FPS > >> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 125.718 FPS > >> 627 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 125.377 FPS > >> > >> If I maximise the window, still no gears just a black terminal window > >> and I get: > >> > >> 93 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 18.474 FPS > >> > >> It's never been that bad before. I've noticed that emerge -uDv world > >> pulled in xorg-drivers and it also emerged xf86-video-ati. I attach t= he > >> list of the packages that were emerged today and my Xorg.0.log, just in > >> case you see something amiss in there. > >> > >> Please ask if you need more info. > >> > >> PS. I have no xorg.conf, but can post the *.fdi files if needed. >=20 > No. See recent post: [gentoo-user] Xorg slow after upgrade >=20 > -- > Valmor Thanks Valmor, I saw the thread. I don't run KDE4 only xdm/fluxbox (althou= gh=20 I run KDE4 applications individually). In the past the odd xorg upgrade mi= ght=20 have made things worse, until a new version came out and restored performan= ce=20 to a good/acceptable level. This current deterioration in performance has= =20 been gradual since I think xorg 1.5. All I can assume is that my hardware = is=20 so getting so old that it is becoming unsupported. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart14141173.5H9SzvGrPk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkrtQSkACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYV4ACgnSbV7aR+9bVD3awURcwfL6jY BawAoLHDAZsEGZgk82srvOydziLSP3N+ =NtUh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14141173.5H9SzvGrPk--