From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3uD6-0004lU-1p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:20:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 130F3E003C; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail16.bluewin.ch (mail16.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.63]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEFAE0877 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) X-FXIT-IP: IPv4[213.3.108.220] Epoch[1256919616] Received: from [213.3.108.220] ([213.3.108.220:56609] helo=dmj.nu) by mail16.bluewin.ch (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTP id 79/79-06154-5321BEA4; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:20:05 +0000 Received: from queen.localnet (queen.dmj.nu [192.168.1.11]) by dmj.nu with esmtp; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:20:05 +0100 id 00000000004287BD.000000004AEB1235.00006D8E From: Dan Johansson To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage strangeness with imagemagick Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:20:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <200910291939.27820.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> <200910292008.28201.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> <200910292116.24736.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200910292116.24736.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Face: &pU{afj:B4l63kI+Lqyk~Sy4/whF_tOpA+G|\c?XeMpAaD/vgsopla?wk%#wum)./P7PL+ m@q{~IZ-Abs^fx8~&y=';Hf|q0QJ9'$hDLY-]G]qZi%D*]t,~cIK7&COJ+PB%k]I>70nan P4a4b,C!8S}q!8f'$0uXtH2dm2:Vcq6?KWwe/=VBL],r+d[~tG.JjxUv8\|`j: X-message-flag: Using Microsoft software might be a security risk Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910301720.04084.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> X-Archives-Salt: 1308cbc2-37a8-4ff8-b110-b429917b4a9e X-Archives-Hash: 00c2b1db7eeab3c88ced797cc8d82d99 On Thursday 29 October 2009 20.16:24 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 29 October 2009 21:08:27 Dan Johansson wrote: > > On Thursday 29 October 2009 19.52:52 Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag 29 Oktober 2009 19:39:27 schrieb Dan Johansson: > > > > Today when I do an update world on one of my serves I get the > > > > following: > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------8<--------------- > > > >-- -- -- ----------------------------- # emerge --update --deep > > > > --verbose --reinstall changed-use --with-bdeps y world --pretend > > > > --tree > > > > > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: > > > > > > > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > > > > > > > emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy ">=x11- > > > > libs/cairo-1.6[X]". > > > > !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your > > > > request: - x11-libs/cairo-1.8.8 (Change USE: +X) > > > > (dependency required by "x11-libs/gtk+-2.16.6" [ebuild]) > > > > (dependency required by "media-gfx/ufraw-0.15-r1" [ebuild]) > > > > (dependency required by "media-gfx/imagemagick-6.5.2.9" [ebuild]) > > > > (dependency required by "www-apps/gallery-2.3" [ebuild]) > > > > (dependency required by "world" [argument]) > > > > ----------------------------------------------------8<--------------- > > > >-- -- -- ----------------------------- > > > > > > > > As this is a server I really do not want/need X on this host. > > > > > > So why do have gtk+ in your USE, then? That's the one that makes ufraw > > > pull in gtk+ which in turn wants cairo with the X flag. OTOH, this > > > doesn't mean you'll get X installed on your machine. You'll only get a > > > handful of X libs. > > > > > > > I can not see why it works if I first deletes all USE flags (-*) and > > > > the just sets the USE flags I need again. > > > > > > Because it's not imagemagick that wants cairo with X (which the emerge > > > output above clearly states). > > > > > > Bye... > > > > > > Dirk > > > > Yes, I can see that it's not imagemagick directly that pulls in cairo. > > And I do not have the gtk USE flag set: > > > > # euse -i gtk > > global use flags (searching: gtk) > > ************************************************************ > > [- ] gtk - Adds support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit) > > <...snip...> > > ufraw's DEPEND: > > RDEPEND="media-libs/jpeg > > >=media-libs/lcms-1.13 > > media-libs/tiff > > >=x11-libs/gtk+-2.4.0 > > You don't have a choice. With ufraw you are going to get gtk+. > > imagemagick pulls in ufraw: > > RDEPEND="raw? ( media-gfx/ufraw ) > > But you have -raw in USE for imagemagick > > Hmm. What does emerge --info have to say about USE=raw? > What does emerge -pvt imagemagick have to say? > I'm thinking raw may be overridden in your profile. what profile are you > using? That was it, if I put -raw in make.conf I am able to upgrade imagemagick without pulling in all the X stuff (~25 new packages). -- Dan Johansson, *************************************************** This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons! ***************************************************