From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1qHp-0000kP-Aj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:44:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5BDBE0835; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939E6E0835 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so9228795ewy.34 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=eJ+dg6Q0Yfuib1e32UROg93H/ZHfb0+5XfXejf9xN7o=; b=uphUAyw+G5DFSu5YMT4gdfhR4E64yBcEUFyQAMR48nH3N+EPvSfX4Ws/od2r+WI851 3y+QTVRVFkdwhlDzXlnoxPQ14zUrQLqAcKRmr57GGT378yWBo98Mjg+8ExlPh/AG3K3E 98GXW6FxJJj0GqwAC7Zlry6Qf4VfZg32qi7QE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=oisKVsNGs1CfDs0TtrcSaE38Uk3psj2rHNFdtDy6b5YkQ0Y0Ky7bI06XSShuAcZ8Ey ToLnctSbVKWAq6hWa++jZV/YGQsJILQxJL1uNqbbEwoNL4+Ct4fYAicg2IqtRZXWRWJ2 mWPD5vHPxntaDIwH55KgBsBAPtwA0rDzXagbA= Received: by 10.211.155.11 with SMTP id h11mr2978164ebo.62.1256427879046; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm9430259eyb.8.2009.10.24.16.44.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:44:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Uncle: qt-*:4 dependencies/blocks preventing world update Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:44:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) References: <7bef1f890910221419o76c9ffc1j58aca7f79cdd6410@mail.gmail.com> <7bef1f890910231829t4437b5a3se1cea6b509621934@mail.gmail.com> <4AE25C78.3040008@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AE25C78.3040008@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1647284.ie7Dnx8tLB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910250044.29545.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: f6c93ff8-e366-48a4-b500-e3dbd7c6ed21 X-Archives-Hash: e9f7fe9a877c99fa9c4c15a23814c134 --nextPart1647284.ie7Dnx8tLB Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 24 October 2009 02:46:32 Dale wrote: > Alan E. Davis wrote: > > I have read a number of different explanations and suggestions, some > > of them regarding an earlier, yet similar, tanglement between versions > > of qt-*. I've tried a number of suggestions, and I have unmerged and > > remerged packages. > > > > I am now trying to individually merge packages with dependencies on > > qt-*-4.5.2. > > > > I tried KDE 4.3.1, with some trepidation, and I have happily been > > running gnome, save a couple of nits, and I have run into qt issues in > > the past. I would like to uninstall kde4 (like it, but not well > > enough to devote so many resources to it, and to have to upgrade > > frequently and painfully). I would like to remove the KDE 4 > > installation, but keep the individual packages depending on kdelibs. > > (K3b, etc.). Would this have an impact on this issue? This is off > > topic, but how to uninstall EXCEPT what I want, of KDE4? Is this > > reasonable? > > > > Thanks. I hope to solve this soon, but it's too early to know > > whether the help on this list was enough. I changed USE flags, and > > the same messages appear: > > > > <> > > > > Thank you, > > > > Alan >=20 > Does this help any? >=20 > root@smoker / # eselect news read 6 > 2009-09-27-qt_use_changes > Title Qt 4.5.2 default USE flag changes > Author Alex Alexander > Posted 2009-09-27 > Revision 1 >=20 > Qt version 4.5.2 has significant changes in the USE flags enabled by > default. >=20 > When upgrading, make sure you check and re-enable any USE flags you > need. >=20 > Depending on your system and installed packages, you might hit an issue > where Portage is getting confused by this USE flag change, trying to mix > old 4.5.1 ebuilds with new 4.5.2 ones, resulting in blocks. >=20 > If this happens to you, please add the offending USE flags (usually > 'qt3support' and 'dbus') in your USE=3D or switch to a desktop profile > (eselect profile list). Check this post [0] for more details on this > issue. >=20 > [0] http://www.linuxized.com/p192 >=20 >=20 > root@smoker / # >=20 > I have this in my USE flags and I didn't run into this that I recall. >=20 > qt3 qt3support qt4 >=20 > I think they are planning to remove qt3 in the future. I'm not sure how > close that future is tho. I think qt3support is the key here. Other than the thread that Dale offers, have you changed your profile to th= e=20 latest 10.0? This had caught me out and went unmerging/emerging qt to get= =20 things to work. I think it would have been easier if I had updated my=20 make.profile first which has the required default USE flags: $ ls -la /etc/make.profile=20 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 54 Oct 22 10:03 /etc/make.profile ->=20 =2E./usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop HTH.=20 =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1647284.ie7Dnx8tLB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkrjkV0ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLaI0gCdHSTses0bMa9ItSlw/6gQyR21 R+AAoLznJU9WGn0UwzGWIkQZE8y5/yL2 =BMia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1647284.ie7Dnx8tLB--